Literature DB >> 17626907

Learning reward expectations in honeybees.

Mariana Gil1, Rodrigo J De Marco, Randolf Menzel.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test whether honeybees develop reward expectations. In our experiment, bees first learned to associate colors with a sugar reward in a setting closely resembling a natural foraging situation. We then evaluated whether and how the sequence of the animals' experiences with different reward magnitudes changed their later behavior in the absence of reinforcement and within an otherwise similar context. We found that the bees that had experienced increasing reward magnitudes during training assigned more time to flower inspection 24 and 48 h after training. Our design and behavioral measurements allowed us to uncouple the signal learning and the nutritional aspects of foraging from the effects of subjective reward values. We thus found that the animals behaved differently neither because they had more strongly associated the related predicting signals nor because they were fed more or faster. Our results document for the first time that honeybees develop long-term expectations of reward; these expectations can guide their foraging behavior after a relatively long pause and in the absence of reinforcement, and further experiments will aim toward an elucidation of the neural mechanisms involved in this form of learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626907      PMCID: PMC1934344          DOI: 10.1101/lm.618907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  17 in total

1.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; M L Kringelbach; E T Rolls; J Hornak; C Andrews
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Multiple reward signals in the brain.

Authors:  W Schultz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Effects of US devaluation on win-stay and win-shift radial maze performance in rats.

Authors:  J R Sage; B J Knowlton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Effects of a reward downshift on the consummatory behavior and flower choices of bumblebee foragers.

Authors:  Daniel D Wiegmann; Douglas A Wiegmann; Faith A Waldron
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-09

5.  Parameters of variable reward distributions that affect risk sensitivity of honey bees.

Authors:  Tamar Drezner-Levy; Sharoni Shafir
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture.

Authors:  L A Real
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Does an increase in reward affect the precision of the encoding of directional information in the honeybee waggle dance?

Authors:  Rodrigo J De Marco; Mariana Gil; Walter M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala complex disrupt acquisition of odor-guided discriminations and reversals.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Barry Setlow; Summer L Nugent; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Honeybee memory: A honeybee knows what to do and when.

Authors:  Shaowu Zhang; Sebastian Schwarz; Mario Pahl; Hong Zhu; Juergen Tautz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  P C Holland; J J Straub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1979-01
View more
  12 in total

1.  Reward expectations in honeybees.

Authors:  Mariana Gil
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  In Search for the Retrievable Memory Trace in an Insect Brain.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Label-based expectations affect incentive contrast effects in bumblebees.

Authors:  Claire T Hemingway; Felicity Muth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 4.  The honeybee as a model for understanding the basis of cognition.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Duration of the unconditioned stimulus in appetitive conditioning of honeybees differentially impacts learning, long-term memory strength, and the underlying protein synthesis.

Authors:  Kathrin Marter; M Katharina Grauel; Carmen Lewa; Laura Morgenstern; Christina Buckemüller; Karin Heufelder; Marion Ganz; Dorothea Eisenhardt
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Ants Can Expect the Time of an Event on Basis of Previous Experiences.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Cammaerts; Roger Cammaerts
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2016-06-14

7.  Serial position learning in honeybees.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant.

Authors:  Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Does an insect's unconditioned response to sucrose reveal expectations of reward?

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Randolf Menzel; Rodrigo J De Marco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms underlying formation of long-term reward memories and extinction memories in the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Dorothea Eisenhardt
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.