Literature DB >> 11937686

Prenatal detection of aneuploidies using fluorescence in situ hybridization: a preliminary experience in an Indian set up.

Vaideji Jobanputra1, Kalol Kumar Roy, Kiran Kucheria.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic technique which allows rapid detection of aneuploidies on interphase cells and metaphase spreads. The aim of the present study was to evaluate FISH as a tool in prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies in high risk pregnancies in an Indian set up. Prenatal diagnosis was carried out in 88 high-risk pregnancies using FISH and cytogenetic analysis. Multicolour commercially available FISH probes specific for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were used. Interphase FISH was done on uncultured cells from chorionic villus and amniotic fluid samples. FISH on metaphase spreads was done from cord blood samples. The results of FISH were in conformity with the results of cytogenetic analysis in all the normal and aneuploid cases except in one case of structural chromosomal abnormality. The hybridization efficiency of the 5 probes used for the detection of aneuploidies was 100%. Using these probes FISH assay yielded discrete differences in the signal profiles between cytogenetically normal and abnormal samples. The overall mean interphase disomic signal patterns of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were 94.45%; for interphase trisomic signal pattern of chromosome 21 was 97.3%. Interphase FISH is very useful in urgent high risk cases. The use of FISH overcomes the difficulties of conventional banding on metaphase spreads and reduces the time of reporting. However, with the limited number of probes used, the conventional cytogenetic analysis serves as a gold standard at present. It should be employed as an adjunctive tool to conventional cytogenetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11937686     DOI: 10.1007/BF02703772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  27 in total

1.  International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used.

Authors:  M I Evans; G P Henry; W A Miller; T H Bui; R J Snidjers; R J Wapner; P Miny; M P Johnson; D Peakman; A Johnson; K Nicolaides; W Holzgreve; S A Ebrahim; R Babu; L Jackson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Authors:  K Klinger; G Landes; D Shook; R Harvey; L Lopez; P Locke; T Lerner; R Osathanondh; B Leverone; T Houseal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  P M Nederlof; S van der Flier; J Wiegant; A K Raap; H J Tanke; J S Ploem; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1990

4.  Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH.

Authors:  T Bryndorf; B Christensen; M Vad; J Parner; M P Carelli; B E Ward; K W Klinger; J Bang; J Philip
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84.

Authors:  T Cremer; J Landegent; A Brückner; H P Scholl; M Schardin; H D Hager; P Devilee; P Pearson; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; C J Tang; P C Watkins; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of X, Y, 18, and 13/21 alpha satellite DNA probes for interphase cytogenetic analysis of uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  V Cacheux; G Tachdjian; L Druart; J F Oury; S Sérero; P Blot; C Nessmann
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniotic cells: experience with 630 samples.

Authors:  S Mercier; J L Bresson
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  1995

9.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens.

Authors:  B E Ward; S L Gersen; M P Carelli; N M McGuire; W R Dackowski; M Weinstein; C Sandlin; R Warren; K W Klinger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Prenatal detection of trisomy 21 in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a prospective study.

Authors:  D H Spathas; A Divane; G M Maniatis; M E Ferguson-Smith; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  3 in total

1.  The importance of rapid aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Ghada M Elsayed; Lobna El Assiouty; Ezzat S El Sobky
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-29

2.  Prenatal diagnosis of common fetal aneuploidies: Scenario in India.

Authors:  V Baburao; Ajit C Gorakshakar
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01

3.  Rapid-prenatal diagnosis through fluorescence in situ hybridization for preventing aneuploidy related birth defects.

Authors:  Ashish Fauzdar; Mohit Chowdhry; R N Makroo; Manoj Mishra; Priyanka Srivastava; Richa Tyagi; Preeti Bhadauria; Anita Kaul
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.