Literature DB >> 10323299

Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions.

P van Donkelaar1.   

Abstract

The influence that the perceived size of visual targets has on the characteristics of pointing movements was investigated in the present study. A size-contrast illusion, known as the Ebbinghaus or Tichener circles, was employed. In this illusion, a target circle surrounded by several smaller circles is perceived to be larger than a target circle of the same physical size surrounded by several larger circles. Movement times of open-loop pointing responses directed to the perceptually smaller target circle were significantly longer than the movement times of pointing responses directed to the perceptually larger target circle. The extent of this difference was similar to that observed when pointing responses were directed at physically different-sized target circles that were not surrounded by other circles. In addition, when the perceptually smaller circle was enlarged so that it appeared to be the same size as the perceptually larger circle, the movement times became equivalent. This evidence supports the contention that the relative rather than the absolute size of the target has a major impact on the control and execution of pointing movements. Such a conclusion contradicts those made previously concerning grasping movements made under similar conditions and implies that pointing responses are more directly influenced by visual perceptual processing than grasping responses.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10323299     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The type of visual information mediates eye and hand movement bias when aiming to a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby Elliott; Martinus J Buekers; Peter Feys; Elke Heremans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perception action interaction: the oblique effect in the evolving trajectory of arm pointing movements.

Authors:  Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Online corrections can produce illusory bias during closed-loop pointing.

Authors:  C Ehresman; D Saucier; M Heath; G Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  How do illusions constrain goal-directed movement: perceptual and visuomotor influences on speed/accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Joshua C Skewes; Andreas Roepstorff; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Learned rather than online relative weighting of visual-proprioceptive sensory cues.

Authors:  Laura Mikula; Valérie Gaveau; Laure Pisella; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Christina Rival; Isabelle Olivier; Hadrien Ceyte; Carole Ferrel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is simple reaction time affected by visual illusions?

Authors:  Irene Sperandio; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.