Literature DB >> 10320082

Intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes.

W Gstoettner1, P Franz, J Hamzavi, H Plenk, W Baumgartner, C Czerny.   

Abstract

There are many different types of cochlear implants available on the market today and they are constantly being re-evaluated and changed. Knowledge of the exact position of the electrode within the cochlea is important in order to improve the electrical stimulation of the hearing nerve by the implants. The stimulating electrodes are usually located peripherally within the scala tympani, although several attempts have been made to develop peri-modiolar located electrode arrays. In this study, our goal was to evaluate the intracochlear positions of Nucleus, Combi 40/Combi 40 +, and newly developed peri-modiolar positioned electrodes by inserting them into fresh human temporal bones. After insertion, the bones were then histologically processed with the electrodes in situ, following perilymphatic formalin perfusion and methylmethacrylate embedding. Sections of the bones 80-100 microm thick were prepared using a sawing, grinding and polishing technique. This technique resulted in excellent preservation of the inner ear structures and clear identification of each electrode. The different types of electrodes were then evaluated as to their insertion depth, trauma to cochlear structures and location in relation to the scala tympani walls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10320082     DOI: 10.1080/00016489950181729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  17 in total

1.  Complication of cochlear implantation surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Mecca; William Wagle; Allison Lupinetti; Steven Parnes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing.

Authors:  Robert H R Bettman; Adriaan F van Olphen; Frans W Zonneveld; Egbert H Huizing
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Internalized elevation perception of simple stimuli in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union?

Authors:  K N Talbot; D E H Hartley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.