Literature DB >> 3826959

A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.

.   

Abstract

Medical journals are a principal source of new knowledge for clinicians. Unfortunately, articles containing valid and valuable information are often buried among others of less value. Innovations are needed to assist clinicians in finding articles that are both scientifically sound and applicable to their practices. An easily implemented, although partial, solution is for authors of articles that have clinical implications to structure their abstracts so that key aspects of purpose, methods, and results are reported with a partly controlled vocabulary and in a standardized format. This would assist clinical readers to select appropriate articles more quickly, allow more precise computerized literature searches, and facilitate peer review before publication.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3826959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  40 in total

1.  The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers.

Authors:  M Docherty; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

2.  Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews.

Authors:  J Hartley
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-10

3.  Reporting of numerical and statistical differences in abstracts: improving but not optimal.

Authors:  Eric Dryver; Janet E Hux
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Increasing access to Latin American social medicine resources: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Holly Shipp Buchanan; Howard Waitzkin; Jonathan Eldredge; Russ Davidson; Celia Iriart; Janis Teal
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2003-10

Review 5.  Current findings from research on structured abstracts.

Authors:  James Hartley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

6.  GNOSIS: guidelines for neuro-oncology: standards for investigational studies-reporting of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials.

Authors:  Susan M Chang; Sharon L Reynolds; Nicholas Butowski; Kathleen R Lamborn; Jan C Buckner; Richard S Kaplan; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract.

Authors:  Takeo Nakayama; Nobuko Hirai; Shigeaki Yamazaki; Mariko Naito
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-04

8.  Medical knowledge for clinical problem solving: a structural analysis of clinical questions.

Authors:  V Florance
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1992-04

9.  Combining text classification and Hidden Markov Modeling techniques for categorizing sentences in randomized clinical trial abstracts.

Authors:  Rong Xu; Kaustubh Supekar; Yang Huang; Amar Das; Alan Garber
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

10.  The check-up before publication: once the peer-review process has been completed, scientific texts are revised one final time by the editors to make them easier to read and to understand.

Authors:  Stephan Mertens
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.