Literature DB >> 10224009

Role of methanogens and other bacteria in degradation of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol in anoxic freshwater sediments.

B P Lomans1, H J Op den Camp, A Pol, C van der Drift, G D Vogels.   

Abstract

The roles of several trophic groups of organisms (methanogens and sulfate- and nitrate-reducing bacteria) in the microbial degradation of methanethiol (MT) and dimethyl sulfide (DMS) were studied in freshwater sediments. The incubation of DMS- and MT-amended slurries revealed that methanogens are the dominant DMS and MT utilizers in sulfate-poor freshwater systems. In sediment slurries, which were depleted of sulfate, 75 micromol of DMS was stoichiometrically converted into 112 micromol of methane. The addition of methanol or MT to DMS-degrading slurries at concentrations similar to that of DMS reduced DMS degradation rates. This indicates that the methanogens in freshwater sediments, which degrade DMS, are also consumers of methanol and MT. To verify whether a competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for DMS or MT takes place in sulfate-rich freshwater systems, the effects of sulfate and inhibitors, like bromoethanesulfonic acid, molybdate, and tungstate, on the degradation of MT and DMS were studied. The results for these sulfate-rich and sulfate-amended slurry incubations clearly demonstrated that besides methanogens, sulfate-reducing bacteria take part in MT and DMS degradation in freshwater sediments, provided that sulfate is available. The possible involvement of an interspecies hydrogen transfer in these processes is discussed. In general, our study provides evidence for methanogenesis as a major sink for MT and DMS in freshwater sediments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10224009      PMCID: PMC91306     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  20 in total

1.  Oxidation of dimethyl sulfide to dimethyl sulfoxide by phototrophic purple bacteria.

Authors:  J Zeyer; P Eicher; S G Wakeham; R P Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Sulfate-Dependent Interspecies H(2) Transfer between Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio vulgaris during Coculture Metabolism of Acetate or Methanol.

Authors:  T J Phelps; R Conrad; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Production and fate of methylated sulfur compounds from methionine and dimethylsulfoniopropionate in anoxic salt marsh sediments.

Authors:  R P Kiene; P T Visscher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Formation of methane and carbon dioxide from dimethylselenide in anoxic sediments and by a methanogenic bacterium.

Authors:  R S Oremland; J P Zehr
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide production from the terminal methiol group of methionine by anaerobic lake sediments.

Authors:  S H Zinder; T D Brock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Production of volatile sulfur compounds by microorganisms.

Authors:  H Kadota; Y Ishida
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Formation of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol in anoxic freshwater sediments.

Authors:  B P Lomans; A Smolders; L M Intven; A Pol; D Op; C Van Der Drift
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Microbial formation of dimethyl sulfide in anoxic sphagnum peat.

Authors:  R P Kiene; M E Hines
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Methylated sulfur compounds in microbial mats: in situ concentrations and metabolism by a colorless sulfur bacterium.

Authors:  P T Visscher; P Quist; H van Gemerden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Anaerobic degradation of methylmercaptan and dimethyl sulfide by newly isolated thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Y Tanimoto; F Bak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Degradation of methanethiol by methylotrophic methanogenic archaea in a lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.

Authors:  F A M de Bok; R C van Leerdam; B P Lomans; H Smidt; P N L Lens; A J H Janssen; A J M Stams
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Isolation and characterization of Methanomethylovorans hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, a methylotrophic methanogen able to grow on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol.

Authors:  B P Lomans; R Maas; R Luderer; H J Op den Camp; A Pol; C van der Drift; G D Vogels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Microbial populations involved in cycling of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  B P Lomans; R Luderer; P Steenbakkers; A Pol; C van Der Drift; G D Vogels; H J Op den Camp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Obligate sulfide-dependent degradation of methoxylated aromatic compounds and formation of methanethiol and dimethyl sulfide by a freshwater sediment isolate, Parasporobacterium paucivorans gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  B P Lomans; P Leijdekkers; J J Wesselink; P Bakkes; A Pol; C van der Drift; H J den Camp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Archaeal communities associated with roots of the common reed (Phragmites australis) in Beijing Cuihu Wetland.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Hong Li; Qun Fang Liu; Yan Hong Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Sulfur pollution suppression of the wetland methane source in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Authors:  Vincent Gauci; Elaine Matthews; Nancy Dise; Bernadette Walter; Dorothy Koch; Gunnar Granberg; Melanie Vile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bacterial SBP56 identified as a Cu-dependent methanethiol oxidase widely distributed in the biosphere.

Authors:  Özge Eyice; Nataliia Myronova; Arjan Pol; Ornella Carrión; Jonathan D Todd; Tom J Smith; Stephen J Gurman; Adam Cuthbertson; Sophie Mazard; Monique Ash Mennink-Kersten; Timothy Dh Bugg; Karl Kristoffer Andersson; Andrew Wb Johnston; Huub Jm Op den Camp; Hendrik Schäfer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle.

Authors:  Gonzalo Martinez-Fernandez; Stephane Duval; Maik Kindermann; Horst J Schirra; Stuart E Denman; Christopher S McSweeney
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Several ways one goal-methanogenesis from unconventional substrates.

Authors:  Julia M Kurth; Huub J M Op den Camp; Cornelia U Welte
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.813

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.