Literature DB >> 16347425

Oxidation of dimethyl sulfide to dimethyl sulfoxide by phototrophic purple bacteria.

J Zeyer1, P Eicher, S G Wakeham, R P Schwarzenbach.   

Abstract

Enrichment cultures of phototrophic purple bacteria rapidly oxidized up to 10 mM dimethyl sulfide (DMS) to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). DMSO was qualitatively identified by proton nuclear magnetic resonance. By using a biological assay, DMSO was always quantitatively recovered from the culture media. DMS oxidation was not detected in cultures incubated in the dark, and it was slow in cultures exposed to full daylight. Under optimal conditions, the second-order rate constant for DMS oxidation was 6 day mg of protein ml. The rate constant was reduced in the presence of high concentration of sulfide (>1 mM), but was not affected by the addition of acetate. DMS was also oxidized to DMSO by a pure strain (tentatively identified as a Thiocystis sp.) isolated from the enrichment cultures. DMS supported growth of the enrichment cultures and of the pure strain by serving as an electron source for photosynthesis. A determination of the amount of protein produced in the cultures and an estimation of the electron balance suggested that the two electrons liberated during the oxidation of DMS to DMSO were quantitatively used to reduce carbon dioxide to biomass. The oxidation of DMS by phototrophic purple bacteria may be an important source of DMSO detected in anaerobic ponds and marshes.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16347425      PMCID: PMC204052          DOI: 10.1128/aem.53.9.2026-2032.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  Enzymatic cleavage of dimethylpropiothetin by Polysiphonia lanosa.

Authors:  D G ANDERSON; G L CANTONI
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1956-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Assay of proteins in the presence of interfering materials.

Authors:  A Bensadoun; D Weinstein
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Metabolism of reduced methylated sulfur compounds in anaerobic sediments and by a pure culture of an estuarine methanogen.

Authors:  R P Kiene; R S Oremland; A Catena; L G Miller; D G Capone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Growth of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata under anaerobic dark conditions with dimethyl sulfoxide.

Authors:  H C Yen; B Marrs
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 5.  Production of volatile sulfur compounds by microorganisms.

Authors:  H Kadota; Y Ishida
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Dimethyl sulfide in the surface ocean and the marine atmosphere: a global view.

Authors:  M O Andreae; H Raemdonck
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dimethyl sulphoxide reduction by micro-organisms.

Authors:  S H Zinder; T D Brock
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1978-04

8.  Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov.

Authors:  F Widdel; N Pfennig
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Production of volatile sulfur compounds during the decomposition of algal mats.

Authors:  S H Zinder; W N Doemel; T D Brock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Dimethyl sulfoxide reductase activity by anaerobically grown Escherichia coli HB101.

Authors:  P T Bilous; J H Weiner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.490

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Role of methanogens and other bacteria in degradation of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol in anoxic freshwater sediments.

Authors:  B P Lomans; H J Op den Camp; A Pol; C van der Drift; G D Vogels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Utilization of dimethyl sulfide as a sulfur source with the aid of light by Marinobacterium sp. strain DMS-S1.

Authors:  H Fuse; O Takimura; K Murakami; Y Yamaoka; T Omori
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  New routes for aerobic biodegradation of dimethylsulfoniopropionate.

Authors:  B F Taylor; D C Gilchrist
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Production and consumption of dimethylsulfoniopropionate in marine microbial mats.

Authors:  P T Visscher; H van Gemerden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Organic thiols as organolithotrophic substrates for growth of phototrophic bacteria.

Authors:  P T Visscher; B F Taylor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Anaerobic versus aerobic degradation of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol in anoxic freshwater sediments.

Authors:  B P Lomans; H J den Camp; A Pol; G D Vogels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Photosynthetic electron transport and anaerobic metabolism in purple non-sulfur phototrophic bacteria.

Authors:  A G McEwan
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  Dimethyl sulfoxide reduction by a hyperhermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 via a cysteine-cystine redox shuttle.

Authors:  Ae Ran Choi; Min-Sik Kim; Sung Gyun Kang; Hyun Sook Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  Isolation and characterization of Methanomethylovorans hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, a methylotrophic methanogen able to grow on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol.

Authors:  B P Lomans; R Maas; R Luderer; H J Op den Camp; A Pol; C van der Drift; G D Vogels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Microbial activity in aquatic environments measured by dimethyl sulfoxide reduction and intercomparison with commonly used methods.

Authors:  C Griebler; D Slezak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.