Literature DB >> 15297612

Sulfur pollution suppression of the wetland methane source in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Vincent Gauci1, Elaine Matthews, Nancy Dise, Bernadette Walter, Dorothy Koch, Gunnar Granberg, Melanie Vile.   

Abstract

Natural wetlands form the largest source of methane (CH(4)) to the atmosphere. Emission of this powerful greenhouse gas from wetlands is known to depend on climate, with increasing temperature and rainfall both expected to increase methane emissions. This study, combining our field and controlled environment manipulation studies in Europe and North America, reveals an additional control: an emergent pattern of increasing suppression of methane (CH(4)) emission from peatlands with increasing sulfate (SO(4)(2-)-S) deposition, within the range of global acid deposition. We apply a model of this relationship to demonstrate the potential effect of changes in global sulfate deposition from 1960 to 2080 on both northern peatland and global wetland CH(4) emissions. We estimate that sulfur pollution may currently counteract climate-induced growth in the wetland source, reducing CH(4) emissions by approximately 15 Tg or 8% smaller than it would be in the absence of global acid deposition. Our findings suggest that by 2030 sulfur pollution may be sufficient to reduce CH(4) emissions by 26 Tg or 15% of the total wetland source, a proportion as large as other components of the CH(4) budget that have until now received far greater attention. We conclude that documented increases in atmospheric CH(4) concentration since the late 19th century are likely due to factors other than the global warming of wetlands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15297612      PMCID: PMC515100          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404412101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Role of methanogens and other bacteria in degradation of dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol in anoxic freshwater sediments.

Authors:  B P Lomans; H J Op den Camp; A Pol; C van der Drift; G D Vogels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in sediments of Mtoni mangrove forest, Tanzania.

Authors:  Thomas J Lyimo; Arjan Pol; Huub J M Op den Camp
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Dynamics of methane production, sulfate reduction, and denitrification in a permanently waterlogged alder swamp.

Authors:  P Westermann; B K Ahring
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments.

Authors:  D R Lovley; D F Dwyer; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  D R Lovley; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Kinetics of acetate oxidation by two sulfate reducers isolated from anaerobic granular sludge

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Playing scales in the methane cycle: from microbial ecology to the globe.

Authors:  Joshua Schimel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Benthic bacterial and fungal productivity and carbon turnover in a freshwater marsh.

Authors:  Nanna Buesing; Mark O Gessner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The impact of simulated sulfate deposition on peatland testate amoebae.

Authors:  Richard Payne; Vincent Gauci; Dan J Charman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Reconciling the climate and ozone response to the 1257 CE Mount Samalas eruption.

Authors:  David C Wade; Céline M Vidal; N Luke Abraham; Sandip Dhomse; Paul T Griffiths; James Keeble; Graham Mann; Lauren Marshall; Anja Schmidt; Alexander T Archibald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Anaerobic oxidization of methane in a minerotrophic peatland: enrichment of nitrite-dependent methane-oxidizing bacteria.

Authors:  Baoli Zhu; Gijs van Dijk; Christian Fritz; Alfons J P Smolders; Arjan Pol; Mike S M Jetten; Katharina F Ettwig
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Microorganisms with novel dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase genes are widespread and part of the core microbiota in low-sulfate peatlands.

Authors:  Doris Steger; Cecilia Wentrup; Christina Braunegger; Pinsurang Deevong; Manuel Hofer; Andreas Richter; Christian Baranyi; Michael Pester; Michael Wagner; Alexander Loy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Sulfate-reducing microorganisms in wetlands - fameless actors in carbon cycling and climate change.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Klaus-Holger Knorr; Michael W Friedrich; Michael Wagner; Alexander Loy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  A 'rare biosphere' microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Norbert Bittner; Pinsurang Deevong; Michael Wagner; Alexander Loy
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Long-Term Transcriptional Activity at Zero Growth of a Cosmopolitan Rare Biosphere Member.

Authors:  Bela Hausmann; Claus Pelikan; Thomas Rattei; Alexander Loy; Michael Pester
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Consortia of low-abundance bacteria drive sulfate reduction-dependent degradation of fermentation products in peat soil microcosms.

Authors:  Bela Hausmann; Klaus-Holger Knorr; Katharina Schreck; Susannah G Tringe; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Alexander Loy; Michael Pester
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.