Literature DB >> 10215978

Predialysis education helps patients choose dialysis modality and increases disease-specific knowledge.

B Klang1, H Björvell, N Clyne.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aims of this study were first, to evaluate the effects of a patient-education programme for a group of 28 uraemic patients (the Experimental (EG) group) with regard to their knowledge and perceived amount of information and to relate these effects to their sense of coherence and secondly, to study the patients' perception of their dialysis treatment. The results were compared with a comparison group (the Companion (CG) group, n = 28) which had received routine information only. The education programme seemed to have covered what the EG wanted to know. Significantly more patients in the EG group stated that they had acquired sufficient knowledge to enable them to participate in choosing dialysis modality compared with the CG group. The EG patients were significantly more informed in the post-educational evaluation compared with the pre-educational evaluation. In the EG, there was a significant relationship between the scores for knowledge and perceived amount of information. Men and younger patients perceived that they had received a greater amount of information than women and older patients. After having started dialysis treatment, there were no differences in the scores for knowledge and information between the EG and the CG. This indicates that other sources of knowledge and information were available to the CG patients. There was no significant correlation between the score of the Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale and the knowledge and information scores. Kidney transplantation, progression of renal failure, other patients' experiences of dialysis, dependence - independence, present and future wellbeing, how to cope with physical and psycho-social demands and continuity in their contacts with doctors and other health professionals were predominant concerns for the two groups of patients.
CONCLUSION: the predialysis group education programme enabled patients to choose dialysis modality to achieve an understanding of their illness and its treatment. It also provided the possibility of informal support by fellow patients and health professionals. The study emphasizes the special needs of elderly patients and we recommend that education programmes are tailored to their requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10215978     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00957.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  21 in total

1.  Renal Replacement Knowledge and Preferences for African Americans With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Akilah King; Fanny Y Lopez; Lydia Lissanu; Eric Robinson; Erik Almazan; Gabrielle Metoyer; Jacob Tanumihardjo; Michael Quinn; Monica Peek; Milda Saunders
Journal:  J Ren Care       Date:  2020-01-09

2.  "I Try Not to Even Think About My Health Going Bad": a Qualitative Study of Chronic Kidney Disease Knowledge and Coping Among a Group of Urban African-American Patients with CKD.

Authors:  Lydia Lissanu; Fanny Lopez; Akilah King; Eric Robinson; Erik Almazan; Gabrielle Metoyer; Michael Quinn; Monica E Peek; Milda R Saunders
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-01-17

3.  Effect of Peer Mentoring on Quality of Life among CKD Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nasrollah Ghahramani; Vernon M Chinchilli; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Eugene J Lengerich; Christopher N Sciamanna
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Renal replacement Therapy and Barriers to choice: using a Mixed Methods approach to explore the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Caroline Jennette; Vimal Derebail; Judy Baldwin; Sandra Cameron
Journal:  J Nephrol Soc Work       Date:  2009

5.  Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality--the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings!

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Zhi Hui Li; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Meng Chan Choong; Marjorie Wai Yin Foo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Educating Patients about CKD: The Path to Self-Management and Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Andrew S Narva; Jenna M Norton; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Geographic and facility-level variation in the use of peritoneal dialysis in Canada: a cohort study.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Navdeep Tangri; Brett Hiebert; Joanne Kappel; Allison Dart; Adeera Levin; Braden Manns; Anita Molzahn; David Naimark; Sharon J Nessim; Claudio Rigatto; Steven D Soroka; Michael Zappitelli; Paul Komenda
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-03-27

8.  Timing of patient-reported renal replacement therapy planning discussions by disease severity among children and young adults with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Derek K Ng; Yunwen Xu; Julien Hogan; Jeffrey M Saland; Larry A Greenbaum; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady; Craig S Wong
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Pre-dialysis clinic attendance improves quality of life among hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Christine A White; Rachel M Pilkey; Miu Lam; David C Holland
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization.

Authors:  Judith Van den Bosch; D Simone Warren; Peter A Rutherford
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.