Literature DB >> 10207910

Problems of adverse pH and bacterial strategies to combat it.

M J Dilworth1, A R Glenn.   

Abstract

This chapter aims to survey the problems faced by bacteria found in environments of adverse pH, to review strategies used to combat those problems and to ask how those strategies are implemented. At acid or alkaline pH, bacteria are challenged not just by excess of H+ or OH- but also by excess of metal ions (aluminium, heavy metals at acidic pH, Na+ at alkaline pH), as well as shortages. Bacteria attempt to maintain their intracellular pH by minimizing membrane permeability to H+ and other ions, buffering the cytoplasm, ameliorating the external pH through catabolism or selective substrate utilization, and developing ionic pumping systems. The amelioration of pH depends on the availability of substrate, and is unlikely in most naturally stressful environments. Ion pumping is expensive energetically, although the cost to growth is unknown. The response to adverse pH involves sensing systems and responsive regulatory systems. The adaptive acid tolerance response is now well known in and other bacteria, but is there a widespread adaptive alkali tolerance response? What and where are the sensors? Whether they sense intracellular pH, extracellular pH or delta pH is unclear, although an external sensory input seems essential. Is there one major sensory system responsive to pH or multiple systems with back-up mechanisms? What and where are the regulators? Is there one central regulator controlling all the responses or are there cascades of responses?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10207910     DOI: 10.1002/9780470515631.ch2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Novartis Found Symp        ISSN: 1528-2511


  9 in total

Review 1.  Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH.

Authors:  Paul D Cotter; Colin Hill
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Molecular characterization of the acid-inducible asr gene of Escherichia coli and its role in acid stress response.

Authors:  Vaida Seputiene; Domantas Motiejūnas; Kestutis Suziedelis; Henrik Tomenius; Staffan Normark; Ojar Melefors; Edita Suziedeliene
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Responses of Listeria monocytogenes to acid stress and glucose availability revealed by a novel combination of fluorescence microscopy and microelectrode ion-selective techniques.

Authors:  Lana Shabala; Birgitte Budde; Tom Ross; Henrik Siegumfeldt; Mogens Jakobsen; Tom McMeekin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a defined medium is very restricted by acid pH and Mg(2+) levels.

Authors:  D L Piddington; A Kashkouli; N A Buchmeier
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes acid tolerance response induced by organic acids at 20 degrees C: optimization and modeling.

Authors:  E J Greenacre; T F Brocklehurst; C R Waspe; D R Wilson; P D G Wilson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Response of Desulfovibrio vulgaris to alkaline stress.

Authors:  Sergey Stolyar; Qiang He; Marcin P Joachimiak; Zhili He; Zamin Koo Yang; Sharon E Borglin; Dominique C Joyner; Katherine Huang; Eric Alm; Terry C Hazen; Jizhong Zhou; Judy D Wall; Adam P Arkin; David A Stahl
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Survival and heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes after exposure to alkali and chlorine.

Authors:  P J Taormina; L R Beuchat
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Geographic distance and pH drive bacterial distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Jinbo Xiong; Yongqin Liu; Xiangui Lin; Huayong Zhang; Jun Zeng; Juzhi Hou; Yongping Yang; Tandong Yao; Rob Knight; Haiyan Chu
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  Evaluation on the responses of succinate dehydrogenase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase to acid shock generated acid tolerance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar Jain; Vivek Jain; Ashish Kumar Singh; Ankur Chauhan; Sarika Sinha
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2013-07-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.