Literature DB >> 10204736

The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy.

V Schade1, N Semmer, C J Main, J Hora, N Boos.   

Abstract

In a prospective controlled trial on 46 patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, three classes of variables (medical data including MRI-identified morphological abnormalities, general psychological factors and psychosocial aspects of work) were analyzed with regard to their predictive value for the outcome of lumbar disc surgery at 2 year follow-up. Multiple regression analyses were used to identify the best predictor variables of four different outcome measures (i.e. pain relief, reduction of disability in daily activities, return to work and surgical outcome). MRI-identified nerve root compromise and social support from the spouse were independent predictors of pain relief 2 years after surgery (R2 = 0.40, P < 0.01). Return to work 2 years after surgery was best predicted by depression and occupational mental stress (R2 = 0.36, P < 0.001). MRI-identified extent of herniation and depression were significant predictors of a good surgical outcome after lumbar discectomy (R2 = 0.61, P < 0.001). This study has demonstrated that the outcome of discectomy is critically dependent on which outcome variables are selected and that different sorts of predictor variables have a distinct influence on the various outcome variables. Obvious morphological alterations (i.e. disc extrusions, nerve root compromise) proved to be significant predictors of postoperative pain relief and improvement of disability in daily activities justifying a surgical treatment approach in these cases. The most important finding of this study was that return to work was not influenced by any clinical findings or MR-identified morphological alterations, but solely by psychological factors (i.e. depression) and psychological aspects of work (i.e. occupational mental stress).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10204736     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00210-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  46 in total

Review 1.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Jasper J den Boer; Rob A B Oostendorp; Tjemme Beems; Marten Munneke; Margreet Oerlemans; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pain Phenotypes and Associated Clinical Risk Factors Following Traumatic Amputation: Results from Veterans Integrated Pain Evaluation Research (VIPER).

Authors:  Thomas Buchheit; Thomas Van de Ven; Hung-Lun John Hsia; Mary McDuffie; David B MacLeod; William White; Alexander Chamessian; Francis J Keefe; Chester Trip Buckenmaier; Andrew D Shaw
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Biopsychosocial factors predict quality of life in thoracolumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Dean A Tripp; Edward Abraham; Maude Lambert; Kate Wagg; Erin Bigney; Eden Daly; Phylicia Verreault; Neil Manson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Persistent Breast Pain Among Women With Histories of Breast-conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer Compared With Women Without Histories of Breast Surgery or Cancer.

Authors:  Sara N Edmond; Rebecca A Shelby; Francis J Keefe; Hannah M Fisher; John E Schmidt; Mary S Soo; Celette S Skinner; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Jessica Manculich; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Early healthcare provider communication with patients and their workplace following a lost-time claim for an occupational musculoskeletal injury.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kosny; Renée-Louise Franche; Jason Pole; Niklas Krause; Pierre Côté; Cameron Mustard
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

9.  Responsiveness of depression and its influence on surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Asdrubal Falavigna; Orlando Righesso; Alisson Roberto Teles; Lucas Piccoli Conzati; Julia Bertholdo Bossardi; Pedro Guarise da Silva; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-22

10.  Effects of multidisciplinary pain treatment can be predicted without elaborate questionnaires.

Authors:  Christian Alexander Fischer; Eva Neubauer; Hanne S Adams; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Haili Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.