Literature DB >> 24811844

Rasch analysis of the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglass Questionnaire.

Mabel Crescioni1, Dawn H Messer, Terri L Warholak, Joseph M Miller, J Daniel Twelker, Erin M Harvey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and refine a newly developed instrument, the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire (SREEQ), designed to measure the impact of uncorrected and corrected refractive error on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in school-aged children.
METHODS: A 38-statement instrument consisting of two parts was developed: part A relates to perceptions regarding uncorrected vision and part B relates to perceptions regarding corrected vision and includes other statements regarding VRQoL with spectacle correction. The SREEQ was administered to 200 Native American 6th- through 12th-grade students known to have previously worn and who currently require eyeglasses. Rasch analysis was conducted to evaluate the functioning of the SREEQ. Statements on parts A and B were analyzed to examine the dimensionality and constructs of the questionnaire, how well the items functioned, and the appropriateness of the response scale used.
RESULTS: Rasch analysis suggested two items be eliminated and the measurement scale for matching items be reduced from a four-point response scale to a three-point response scale. With these modifications, categorical data were converted to interval-level data to conduct an item and person analysis. A shortened version of the SREEQ was constructed with these modifications, the SREEQ-R, which included the statements that were able to capture changes in VRQoL associated with spectacle wear for those with significant refractive error in our study population.
CONCLUSIONS: Although part B of the SREEQ appears to have a less-than-optimal reliability to assess the impact of spectacle correction on VRQoL in our student population, it is able to detect statistically significant differences from pretest to posttest on both the group and individual levels to show that the instrument can assess the impact that glasses have on VRQoL. Further modifications to the questionnaire, such as those included in the SREEQ-R, could enhance its functionality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24811844      PMCID: PMC4045236          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  19 in total

1.  The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Konrad Pesudovs; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The Adolescent and Child Health Initiative to Encourage Vision Empowerment (ACHIEVE) study design and baseline data.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Lisa A Jones; Monica Chitkara; Bradley Coffey; John Mark Jackson; Ruth E Manny; Marjorie J Rah; Mitchell J Prinstein; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Donald E Stull; Nancy Kline Leidy; Bhash Parasuraman; Olivier Chassany
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.580

4.  Measuring pretest-posttest change with a Rasch Rating Scale Model.

Authors:  E W Wolfe; C W Chiu
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1999

5.  Visual impairment and its impact on health-related quality of life in adolescents.

Authors:  Hwee-Bee Wong; David Machin; Say-Beng Tan; Tien-Yin Wong; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  Jason J Nichols; G Lynn Mitchell; Mario Saracino; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09

7.  Development of an instrument to assess vision-related quality of life in young children.

Authors:  Joost Felius; David R Stager; Priscilla M Berry; Sherry L Fawcett; David R Stager; Solange R Salomão; Adriana Berezovsky; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Patient recall and recall bias of health state and health status.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Rasch analysis of the quality of life and vision function questionnaire.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Thomas A Wright; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Carol M Mangione; Leon Ellwein; Anne S Lindblad; Karen L Spritzer; Peter J McDonnell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  1 in total

1.  Establishing the Validity and Reliability Evidence of Preceptor Assessment of Student Tool.

Authors:  Lili Zhou; Abdulaali R Almutairi; Nimer S Alsaid; Terri L Warholak; Janet Cooley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.