Literature DB >> 10200019

Exposure-response relationships for work-related sensitization in workers exposed to rat urinary allergens: results from a pooled study.

D Heederik1, K M Venables, P Malmberg, A Hollander, A S Karlsson, A Renström, G Doekes, M Nieuwenhijsen, S Gordon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies in a few industries have shown that the likelihood of IgE-mediated sensitization increases with increasing exposure. The shape of the exposure-response relationships and modification by age, sex, and smoking habit has hardly been studied.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine exposure sensitization relationships for rat sensitization and to evaluate the influence of atopy, smoking habits, and sex.
METHODS: Data from 3 cross-sectional studies in The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Sweden were used and involved 1062 animal laboratory workers. Selection criteria were harmonized, and this resulted in a study population of 650 animal laboratory workers (60.6% female) with less than 4 years of exposure. Air allergen levels were assessed previously and converted on the basis of an interlaboratory allergen analysis comparison. Available sera were analyzed for the presence of specific antibodies against common allergens (house dust mite, cat, dog, and grass and birch pollen) and work-related allergens (rat and mouse urinary proteins). Questionnaire items on work-related respiratory symptoms, hours worked with rats per week, job performed, smoking habits, and sex were used in this analysis
RESULTS: The prevalence of work-related sensitization to rat urinary allergens (IgE >0.7 KU/L) was 9.7 % (n = 63). Thirty-six of the sensitized workers had work-related symptoms (asthma or rhinitis). Two hundred forty-eight workers (38.2%) were atopic (defined as specific IgE to 1 of the common allergens). The sensitization rate increased with increasing air allergen exposure. Atopic workers exposed to low levels of allergen had a more than 3-fold increased sensitization risk compared with nonexposed atopic workers. For atopic subjects, the risk increased little with increasing exposure, whereas for nonatopic subjects, a steadily increasing risk was observed. Smoking and sex did not modify the sensitization risk.
CONCLUSION: Rat urinary allergen-sensitization risk increased with increasing exposure intensity. Workers who were atopic had a clearly elevated sensitization risk at low allergen exposure levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10200019     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70242-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  18 in total

1.  Exposure assessment of high molecular weight sensitisers: contribution to occupational epidemiology and disease prevention.

Authors:  D Heederik; G Doekes; M J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Detection of workers sensitised to high molecular weight allergens: a diagnostic study in laboratory animal workers.

Authors:  E Meijer; D E Grobbee; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Incidence of allergy and allergy symptoms among workers exposed to laboratory animals.

Authors:  L Elliott; D Heederik; S Marshall; D Peden; D Loomis
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Effects of the indoor environment on the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide in school-aged children.

Authors:  Thomas A Kovesi; Robert E Dales
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Is there a need for special preventive medical check-ups in employees exposed to experimental animal dust?

Authors:  Klaus Schmid; Barbara Jüngert; Meta Hager; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Prevalence and host determinants of occupational bronchial asthma in animal shelter workers.

Authors:  Anna Krakowiak; Patrycja Krawczyk; Bogdan Szulc; Marta Wiszniewska; Monika Kowalczyk; Jolanta Walusiak; Cezary Pałczyński
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Occupational rhinitis.

Authors:  J Wesley Sublett; David I Bernstein
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 9.  Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Meinir Jones
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

10.  Exposure-response relations among laboratory animal workers exposed to rats.

Authors:  M J Nieuwenhuijsen; V Putcha; S Gordon; D Heederik; K M Venables; P Cullinan; A J Newman-Taylor
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.