AIM: To explore exposure-response relations in a cohort of laboratory animal workers. METHODS: Exposure-response modelling was carried out in a cohort of 342 laboratory animal workers. Three exposure indices, divided into different exposure categories, were used in the analyses: intensity of exposure to rat urinary aeroallergen (RUA, the main allergen workers were exposed to), weekly duration of exposure to rats, and the product of the intensity and weekly duration of exposure. Outcomes studied were work related chest, eyes and nose, and skin symptoms that had started after employment at the sites, specific sensitisation, and a combination of symptoms and sensitisation. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to explore exposure-response relations. Smoking, atopic status, age, and gender were taken into account. RESULTS: We observed the clearest exposure-response relations for the intensity of exposure to RUA and the various endpoints. No clear exposure-response relations were observed for the weekly duration of exposure or the product of the intensity and weekly duration of exposure. The strongest and clearest exposure-response relations for symptoms were observed among rat sensitised workers, while the non-sensitised workers only showed small increased risks of developing symptoms without clear exposure-response relations. Sensitised workers were almost four times more likely to go on to develop chest symptoms compared to non-sensitised workers.
AIM: To explore exposure-response relations in a cohort of laboratory animal workers. METHODS: Exposure-response modelling was carried out in a cohort of 342 laboratory animal workers. Three exposure indices, divided into different exposure categories, were used in the analyses: intensity of exposure to rat urinary aeroallergen (RUA, the main allergen workers were exposed to), weekly duration of exposure to rats, and the product of the intensity and weekly duration of exposure. Outcomes studied were work related chest, eyes and nose, and skin symptoms that had started after employment at the sites, specific sensitisation, and a combination of symptoms and sensitisation. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to explore exposure-response relations. Smoking, atopic status, age, and gender were taken into account. RESULTS: We observed the clearest exposure-response relations for the intensity of exposure to RUA and the various endpoints. No clear exposure-response relations were observed for the weekly duration of exposure or the product of the intensity and weekly duration of exposure. The strongest and clearest exposure-response relations for symptoms were observed among rat sensitised workers, while the non-sensitised workers only showed small increased risks of developing symptoms without clear exposure-response relations. Sensitised workers were almost four times more likely to go on to develop chest symptoms compared to non-sensitised workers.
Authors: P Cullinan; A Cook; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; C Sandiford; R D Tee; K M Venables; J C McDonald; A J Newman Taylor Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2001-03
Authors: D Heederik; K M Venables; P Malmberg; A Hollander; A S Karlsson; A Renström; G Doekes; M Nieuwenhijsen; S Gordon Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: M J Nieuwenhuijsen; C P Sandiford; D Lowson; R D Tee; K M Venables; J C McDonald; A J Newman Taylor Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: P Cullinan; A Cook; S Gordon; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; R D Tee; K M Venables; J C McDonald; A J Taylor Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Roger D Peng; Beverly Paigen; Peyton A Eggleston; Karol A Hagberg; Mary Krevans; Jean Curtin-Brosnan; Cristy Benson; Wayne G Shreffler; Elizabeth C Matsui Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Maria C D'Ovidio; Annarita Wirz; Danila Zennaro; Stefania Massari; Paola Melis; Vittoria M Peri; Chiara Rafaiani; Maria C Riviello; Adriano Mari Journal: AIMS Public Health Date: 2018-10-09
Authors: Thomas A E Platts-Mills; Behnam Keshavarz; Jeffrey M Wilson; Rung-Chi Li; Peter W Heymann; Diane R Gold; Emily C McGowan; Elizabeth A Erwin Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-05-20