Literature DB >> 10199648

Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade?

C Rorden1, J Driver.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, we examined whether auditory attention shifts in the direction of an upcoming saccade, as recently reported for visual attention. Normal listeners made speeded discriminations for the elevation (up versus down) of abrupt sounds, regardless of their laterality. Each sound was presented around the time that a lateral saccade was made. Auditory elevation discriminations were reliably faster when the saccade was made towards the side of the auditory probe rather than away. Furthermore, an auditory probe on one side speeded up centrally-cued saccades made in that direction, although sounds did not influence saccades to peripheral visual events. The latter visual events were insufficient to affect hearing unless a saccade was made towards them. A further study showed that fixating towards or away from sounds, rather than saccading, could also affect elevation judgements, with poorer performance when fixating away. However, the influence of an upcoming saccade upon hearing could not be reduced to this fixation effect, since the saccade influence was found even for sounds which terminated before any shift in fixation began. Taken together, our results imply that the direction of an upcoming saccade can affect hearing, as can eye-position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10199648     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00072-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  15 in total

1.  Eye-gaze and arrow cues influence elementary sound perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Borjon; Stephen V Shepherd; Alexander Todorov; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  "Acoustical vision" of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Francesca Frassinetti; Andrea Serino; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of gaze direction on sound localization in brain-injured and normal adults.

Authors:  Eunhui Lie; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.

Authors:  Chanon M Jones; Rob Gray; Charles Spence; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Distortions of auditory space during rapid head turns.

Authors:  Joel Cooper; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Bettina Forster; José Van Velzen; Gita Prabhu
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Links between eye movement preparation and the attentional processing of tactile events: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.