Literature DB >> 10196835

In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.

A Steele1, B R Johnson.   

Abstract

The recent introduction of new bonding agents has led some authors to suggest that certain endodontically treated posterior teeth could be restored with a bonded restoration instead of a full-coverage crown or onlay. To test the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with and without bonding agents, we randomly divided 56 intact and caries-free maxillary premolars into seven groups as follows: unaltered teeth; access only; MOD prep and RCT; MOD prep, RCT, and amalgam restoration; MOD prep, RCT, and amalgam with 4-META bonding agent; MOD prep, RCT, and composite resin restoration; and MOD prep, RCT, and composite resin with 4-META bonding agent. The teeth were subjected to compressive fracture tests in a Zwick 1435 Universal Testing Machine. Unaltered teeth and those with access only demonstrated similar fracture strengths. Under the conditions of this study, there was no significant difference in fracture strength between the experimental groups.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10196835     DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80389-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  18 in total

1.  The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto; Paulo Sérgio Quagliatto; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars: An In-vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Pr Pradeep; Vc Sunil Kumar; Sunil Rao Bantwal; Gurinderjeet Singh Gulati
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-12-26

3.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite.

Authors:  Almira Isufi; Gianluca Plotino; Nicola Maria Grande; Pietro Ioppolo; Luca Testarelli; Rossella Bedini; Dina Al-Sudani; Gianluca Gambarini
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-07-19

4.  Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Prashant Monga; Vivek Sharma; Sukesh Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-10

5.  'Split posterior tooth': conservative clinical re-attachment.

Authors:  Sathish Abraham; Lisa Neelathil Chacko
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-30

6.  Fracture resistance and pattern of the upper premolars with obturated canals and restored endodontic occlusal access cavities.

Authors:  Younong Wu; Peter Cathro; Victor Marino
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2010-11

7.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Different Positions.

Authors:  Elmira Jafari Navimipour; Mohammad Esmaeel Ebrahimi Chaharom; Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee; Narmin Mohammadi; Mahmoud Bahari; Maryam Firouzmandi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-11-12

8.  Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load.

Authors:  Istabrak Hasan; Matthias Frentzen; Karl-Heinz Utz; Daniel Hoyer; Alexander Langenbach; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2012-08-03

9.  Stress distribution changes after root canal therapy in canine model: a finite element study.

Authors:  Allahyar Geramy; Mohammad Jafar Eghbal; Sara Ehsani
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2008-10-01

10.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Maryam Sadat Tavangar; Yasamin Ghahramani; Zahra Fattah
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.