Literature DB >> 23554665

Fracture resistance and pattern of the upper premolars with obturated canals and restored endodontic occlusal access cavities.

Younong Wu1, Peter Cathro, Victor Marino.   

Abstract

We studied whether obturing canals and restoring endodontic occlusal access cavities on upper premolars could provide acceptable resistance and pattern to fracture. Eighteen upper premolars were divided equally into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of intact controls; group 2 had access cavities and root canal preparations; group 3 as in group 2 but obturated with gutta-percha and AH26, and the access cavity restored with glass ionomer and composite. Specimens were submitted to compressive strength testing using the Hounsfield Universal H50KM testing machine with a load cell of 2000 Newtons and a crosshead speed set at 1.0 mm/min until fracture. The results from the compressive strength tests showed that intact controls (1105.83±90.93 MPa) and restored premolars (936.67±44.67 MPa) were significantly different from premolars with unrestored access cavities 568.33±105.49 MPa. There was no significant difference between intact controls and restored premolars. The predominant fracture pattern for intact teeth was an oblique fracture. For premolars that had endodontic access cavities, restored or unrestored, the most common fracture pattern was a vertical fracture. The restoration of occlusal access cavities with glass ionomer and composite provided fracture resistance close to that of intact controls, but when restored teeth fractured, they were predominantly non-restorable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fracture; premolar; root canal preparation

Year:  2010        PMID: 23554665      PMCID: PMC3596696          DOI: 10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60063-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Res        ISSN: 1674-8301


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth.

Authors:  J Jantarat; P Panitvisai; J E Palamara; H H Messer
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.

Authors:  A Steele; B R Johnson
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Effect of restorative procedures and occlusal loading on cuspal deflection.

Authors:  Santiago González-López; Francisco De Haro-Gasquet; Miguel Angel Vílchez-Díaz; Laura Ceballos; Manuel Bravo
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  Endodontics 1776-1976: a bicentennial history against the background of general dentistry.

Authors:  L I Grossman
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  J A Sorensen; J T Martinoff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures.

Authors:  E S Reeh; H H Messer; W H Douglas
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Resistance to fracture of teeth with various preparations for amalgam.

Authors:  G A Caron; D F Murchison; R B Cohen; J C Broome
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture.

Authors:  C A Howe; D J McKendry
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Luciano de V Habekost; Guilherme B Camacho; Eduardo C Azevedo; Flavio F Demarco
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin.

Authors:  Paulo Vinícius Soares; Paulo César Freitas Santos-Filho; Ellyne Cavalcanti Queiroz; Thiago Caixeta Araújo; Roberto Elias Campos; Cleudmar Amaral Araújo; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influence of conservative endodontic access and the osteoporotic bone on the restoration material adhesive behavior through finite element analysis.

Authors:  Aline Batista Gonçalves Franco; Amanda Gonçalves Franco; Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho; Elimario Venturin Ramos; José Cláudio Faria Amorim; Alexandre Sigrist de Martim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with cervical defects using different restorative treatments.

Authors:  Yi-Bai Guo; Wei Bai; Yu-Hong Liang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.719

3.  Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites.

Authors:  Márk Fráter; Lippo Lassila; Gábor Braunitzer; Pekka K Vallittu; Sufyan Garoushi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Fatigue performance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect cuspal coverage restorations utilizing fiber-reinforced cores.

Authors:  Márk Fráter; Tekla Sáry; Janka Molnár; Gábor Braunitzer; Lippo Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Sufyan Garoushi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Mechanical Performance of Direct Restorative Techniques Utilizing Long Fibers for "Horizontal Splinting" to Reinforce Deep MOD Cavities-An Updated Literature Review.

Authors:  András Jakab; András Volom; Tekla Sáry; Eszter Vincze-Bandi; Gábor Braunitzer; David Alleman; Sufyan Garoushi; Márk Fráter
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Fracture Behavior of Short Fiber-Reinforced Direct Restorations in Large MOD Cavities.

Authors:  Márk Fráter; Tekla Sáry; Eszter Vincze-Bandi; András Volom; Gábor Braunitzer; Balázs Szabó P; Sufyan Garoushi; András Forster
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.