Literature DB >> 24453439

Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars: An In-vitro evaluation.

Pr Pradeep1, Vc Sunil Kumar2, Sunil Rao Bantwal3, Gurinderjeet Singh Gulati4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to measure the invitro fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with silver amalgam, composite resins and bonded amalgam. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Sixty mature maxillary premolars free of caries, restoration or fracture extracted for orthodontic purpose or periodontal reasons were selected. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth each. Group I: Intact teeth, Group II: Access opening only, Group III: Standard MOD cavity preparation + superimposed endodontic access (Unrestored). In Group IV, Group V & Group VI preparation was done as in Group III and they were restored with amalgam, bonded amalgam and composite resins respectively. All the teeth were thermo cycled and were mounted on custom made rings and the fracture strength was calculated with an Instron testing machine and the results were analysed statistically.
RESULTS: Group I showed the highest fracture resistance followed by Group II . The difference in the values between the two groups were not significant. Group III showed the lowest fracture resistance the decrease in fracture strength was highly statistically significant when compared to all other groups investigated in the present study. Fracture strength of teeth restored with Group IV, Group V, Group VI did not differ significantly from each other.
CONCLUSION: Fracture strength of intact natural teeth was superior to all the teeth tested in the study. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with conventional amalgam, bonded amalgam and composite resin did not differ significantly from each other. Bonding of restorations to tooth structure has failed to bring about any improvement in the strength of the teeth tested. How to cite this article: Pradeep PR, Kumar VC, Bantwal SR, Gulati GS. Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars: An In-vitro evaluation. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(6):9-17 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amalgam restoration; bonded amalgam restoration; bonding agent; composite resin restoration; fracture resistance

Year:  2013        PMID: 24453439      PMCID: PMC3895712     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Oral Health        ISSN: 0976-1799


  24 in total

1.  Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.

Authors:  D W Boston
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin.

Authors:  N Nakabayashi; M Ashizawa; M Nakamura
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  Hydrolysis of 4-META/MMA-TBB resins: a myth.

Authors:  N J Gendusa
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

4.  Bonding fresh amalgam to existing amalgam: a shear and flexural strength study.

Authors:  C Leelawat; W Scherer; J Chang; T Vijayaraghavan; J LeGeros
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

5.  Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique.

Authors:  E S Reeh; W H Douglas; H H Messer
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth.

Authors:  R B Joynt; G Wieczkowski; R Klockowski; E L Davis
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Resistance to cusp fracture in class II prepared and restored premolars.

Authors:  M N Gelb; E Barouch; R J Simonsen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Fracture resistance of premolars with MOD amalgam restorations lined with Amalgambond.

Authors:  A C Santos; J C Meiers
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique.

Authors:  D Morin; R DeLong; W H Douglas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials.

Authors:  F de C Oliveira; G E Denehy; D B Boyer
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exploring the biomechanics of taurodontism.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Huynh N Nguyen; Ottmar Kullmer; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The pattern of fracture of endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Christopher Ikeokwu Udoye; Matthew Asizide Sede; Hamid Jafarzadeh
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2014-11-30

3.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored by Various Direct Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jozef Mincik; Daniel Urban; Silvia Timkova; Renata Urban
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2016-08-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.