Literature DB >> 10196798

The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test.

S Phrukkanon1, M F Burrow, M J Tyas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the cross-sectional area shape (cylindrical vs. rectangular) and the bonding surface area on the microtensile bond strengths and stress distribution of four dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond MP Plus, OptiBond FL, OptiBond Solo, One-Step). In addition, finite element analysis (FEA) models were developed to investigate stress distributions.
METHODS: Extracted human molars were cut vertically and the occlusal enamel removed; one-half of the tooth was used for rectangular specimens, the other half for cylindrical specimens. The occlusal dentin was bonded according to the manufacturers' directions and covered with a block of resin composite. For the cylindrical specimens, the bonded dentin was shaped with a diamond bur on a lathe to produce specimens of area 1.1, 1.5 or 3.1 mm2 at the bonded interface. The rectangular specimens were sectioned to obtain bar-shaped specimens, which were shaped to produce hour-glass shaped specimens with the same area as the round specimens. Bonds were stressed in tension at a speed of 1 mm min-1. The mean bond strengths were compared using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, LSD and Student's t tests. The fractured surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy, and the frequencies of the fracture modes were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. FEA models were created simulating the cross-sectional areas for bonding to determine the stress distribution.
RESULTS: The 3.1 mm2 bonding area groups showed significantly lower bond strengths than the 1.1 mm2 bonding area groups (p < 0.05), except for the rectangular specimens using Scotchbond MP Plus and One-Step. Most cylindrical specimens of bonding area 1.1 or 1.5 mm2 exhibited adhesive failure at the interface between the dentin and the adhesive resin. No differences were determined between cylindrical and rectangular specimens. The fracture mode matched the stress distribution patterns calculated from the FEA modeling. SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that the test methods using small surface areas produce higher bond strengths than those using larger surface areas, and that cross-sectional shape has little effect. This is probably a result of fewer defects occurring in the small-area specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10196798     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(98)00034-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  18 in total

1.  Effects of polymerization contraction on interface's microTBS of luting material and dentin.

Authors:  Elena Cabrera; José C de la Macorra
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin.

Authors:  Mouhamed Sarr; Atsushi Mine; Jan De Munck; Marcio Vivan Cardoso; Abdoul Wakhabe Kane; José Vreven; Bart Van Meerbeek; Kirsten L Van Landuyt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  On the fatigue behavior of resin-dentin bonds after degradation by biofilm.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Mutluay; Ke Zhang; Heonjune Ryou; Mobin Yahyazadehfar; Hessam Majd; Hockin H K Xu; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-11-17

4.  In vitro enzymatic biodegradation of adhesive resin in the hybrid layer.

Authors:  Yuan Zou; Julie L P Jessop; Steven R Armstrong
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  An in vitro Comparative Evaluation of Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Two metal bonding Resin Cements bonded to Cobalt Chromium alloy.

Authors:  Smita Musani; Iqbal Musani; Ramandeep Dugal; Nitin Habbu; Pallavi Madanshetty; Danish Virani
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

6.  Microtensile bond strength of cad-cam and pressed-ceramic inlays to dentin.

Authors:  A Nilgün Oztürk; Ozgür Inan; Erkan Inan; Bora Oztürk
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2007-04

7.  Evaluation of plasma treatment effects on improving adhesive-dentin bonding by using the same tooth controls and varying cross-sectional surface areas.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Dong; Andrew C Ritts; Corey Staller; Qingsong Yu; Meng Chen; Yong Wang
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  Fatigue of the resin-enamel bonded interface and the mechanisms of failure.

Authors:  Mobin Yahyazadehfar; Mustafa Murat Mutluay; Hessam Majd; Heonjune Ryou; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-03-01

9.  Factors affecting the bond strength of self-etch adhesives: A meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  P Pranau Vanajasan; Malarvizhi Dhakshinamoorthy; Cv Subba Rao
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-01

10.  Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effects of composite resin.

Authors:  Andrea Mello de Andrade; Sandra Kiss Moura; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Eugenio Jose Garcia; Rosa Helena Miranda Grande
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.