Literature DB >> 10196718

Acoustic properties of NC100100 and their relation with the microbubble size distribution.

P C Sontum1, J Ostensen, K Dyrstad, L Hoff.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: NC100100 is a contrast agent for medical imaging with ultrasonography consisting of stabilized gas microbubbles in an aqueous suspension. The objective of this article is to explore the acoustic properties of NC100100 and their relation with the microbubble size distribution. The results are used to motivate the choice of a suitable assay/dosage parameter for precise control of product efficacy.
METHODS: The concentration and size distribution of microbubbles in > 50 preparations of NC100100 were determined by Coulter counting, and the acoustic attenuation and backscatter efficacy were determined for all samples. The in vivo efficacy of the product was investigated by harmonic imaging of the heart in a dog model.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the attenuation and backscatter efficacy per microbubble volume vary strongly with size, showing distinct maxima with respect to microbubble diameter. Sizes for optimal attenuation per volume ranged from 2.6 to 5.8 microns, depending on ultrasound frequency. The contribution of the smaller end tail of the microbubble distribution was shown to be negligible. From the observed size dependency for the acoustic properties, the volume concentration of microbubbles was chosen as the assay/dosage parameter for NC100100. The accuracy of this parameter as a descriptor of product efficacy was demonstrated by precise, linear relations between volume, concentration, and attenuation/backscatter. In comparison, the correlation between the microbubble number and acoustic properties was not significant. Results from the in vivo study showed a precise, linear relation between injected microbubble volume and the observed in vivo efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: The acoustic properties of NC100100 are dependent on microbubble size. The observed batch-to-batch variance in the acoustic properties of the product may be fully explained by variation in concentration and size. Microbubble volume is a more precise predictor of in vitro/in vivo efficacy than microbubble number and consequently was chosen as the assay/dosage parameter for NC100100.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10196718     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199904000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  12 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Dhiman Chatterjee; William T Shi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Detection of focal liver lesions in cirrhotic liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Hui-Xiong Xu; Xiao-Yan Xie
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

4.  Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with perflubutane for diagnosing the macroscopic type of small nodular hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  Toshifumi Tada; Takashi Kumada; Hidenori Toyoda; Takanori Ito; Yasuhiro Sone; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Seiji Okuda; Katsuhiko Otobe; Kenichi Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Ultrasound image-guided therapy enhances antitumor effect of cisplatin.

Authors:  Noboru Sasaki; Nobuki Kudo; Kensuke Nakamura; Sue Yee Lim; Masahiro Murakami; W R Bandula Kumara; Yu Tamura; Hiroshi Ohta; Masahiro Yamasaki; Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for assessment of lymph node metastases in pancreatobiliary carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Miyata; Masayuki Kitano; Shunsuke Omoto; Kumpei Kadosaka; Ken Kamata; Hajime Imai; Hiroki Sakamoto; Naoshi Nisida; Yogesh Harwani; Takamichi Murakami; Yoshifumi Takeyama; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Hiroo Imazu; Naoki Mori; Keisuke Kanazawa; Masafumi Chiba; Hirobumi Toyoizumi; Yuichi Torisu; Seita Koyama; Shoryoku Hino; Tiing Leong Ang; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Pancreatic Tumors.

Authors:  Yasunobu Yamashita; Jun Kato; Kazuki Ueda; Yasushi Nakamura; Yuki Kawaji; Hiroko Abe; Junya Nuta; Takashi Tamura; Masahiro Itonaga; Takeichi Yoshida; Hiroki Maeda; Takao Maekita; Mikitaka Iguchi; Hideyuki Tamai; Masao Ichinose
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Spatial and temporal profile of cisplatin delivery by ultrasound-assisted intravesical chemotherapy in a bladder cancer model.

Authors:  Noboru Sasaki; Kazuhiro Ishi; Nobuki Kudo; Shouta M M Nakayama; Kensuke Nakamura; Keitaro Morishita; Hiroshi Ohta; Mayumi Ishizuka; Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.