Literature DB >> 10196091

Sex specific X chromosome expression caused by genomic imprinting.

Y Iwasa1, A Pomiankowski.   

Abstract

The conflict theory of genomic imprinting predicts that imprinted genes are growth enhancing when paternally expressed and growth suppressing when maternally expressed. The expression pattern of autosomal imprinted genes generally fits these predictions. However, the conflict theory cannot easily account for the pattern of X-linked imprinting in humans and mice. This has led us to propose a novel hypothesis that X-linked imprinting has evolved to control sex specific gene expression in early embryos. The hypothesis links paternal X-imprinting (i.e. paternal copy silencing) to random X-inactivation and the retention of Y-linked copies, and links maternal X-imprinting to escape from random X-inactivation and the loss of Y-linked copies. The hypothesis offers a good explanation of the existing data on X-imprinted genes. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10196091     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  11 in total

1.  The evolution of X-linked genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effect of genetic conflict on genomic imprinting and modification of expression at a sex-linked locus.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Marcus W Feldman; Andrew G Clark; Anton E Weisstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic imprinting and the social brain.

Authors:  Anthony R Isles; William Davies; Lawrence S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; A G Clark
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Turner syndrome and the evolution of human sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Empirical testing of hypotheses about the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals.

Authors:  David G Ashbrook; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.