| Literature DB >> 10196091 |
Abstract
The conflict theory of genomic imprinting predicts that imprinted genes are growth enhancing when paternally expressed and growth suppressing when maternally expressed. The expression pattern of autosomal imprinted genes generally fits these predictions. However, the conflict theory cannot easily account for the pattern of X-linked imprinting in humans and mice. This has led us to propose a novel hypothesis that X-linked imprinting has evolved to control sex specific gene expression in early embryos. The hypothesis links paternal X-imprinting (i.e. paternal copy silencing) to random X-inactivation and the retention of Y-linked copies, and links maternal X-imprinting to escape from random X-inactivation and the loss of Y-linked copies. The hypothesis offers a good explanation of the existing data on X-imprinted genes. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10196091 DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Theor Biol ISSN: 0022-5193 Impact factor: 2.691