Literature DB >> 10192571

Loop ileostomy: technical aspects and complications.

E Carlsen1, A B Bergan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of complications of construction and closure of loop ileostomies and the final outcome for the patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital, Norway.
SUBJECTS: 100 patients with 103 loop ileostomies, operated on between 1980 and 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of complications after ileostomy construction and closure.
RESULTS: 7 required re-operation after construction of the loop ileostomy and 11 after its closure. The most common cause was small intestinal obstruction (4 after construction and 6 after closure). 2 developed stomal necrosis. The mean duration of hospital stay was 13 and 10 days for primary and secondary loop ileostomy, respectively, and the mean time before closure was 31 weeks. After closure another 6 developed leaks from the ileal anastomosis that required further operation. Patients with secondary loop ileostomies had their stomas significantly longer than those with primary loop ileostomies (21 compared with 43 weeks, p = 0.00005).
CONCLUSION: Despite the number of complications, we think that faecal diversion is still justified in complex pelvic surgery and we should try to reduce the complication rate further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10192571     DOI: 10.1080/110241599750007324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  16 in total

1.  Testing for anastomotic integrity after reversal of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  M S Metcalfe; D Hemingway
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The effect of faecal diversion on human ileum.

Authors:  Leith Williams; Matthew J Armstrong; Matthew Armstrong; Paul Finan; Peter Sagar; Dermot Burke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection.

Authors:  Oscar Åkesson; Ingvar Syk; Gudrun Lindmark; Pamela Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Early stomal complications.

Authors:  Brian R Kann
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

6.  Risk factors for complications after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who have undergone rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Takatoshi Nakamura; Takeo Sato; Masanori Naito; Takahiro Yamanashi; Hirohisa Miura; Atsuko Tsutsui; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Peritoneofascial suture method for facilitating loop ileostomy mobilization.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Jung; Jae-Hwang Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity.

Authors:  S N Amin; M A Memon; N C Armitage; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Rod in loop ileostomy: just an insignificant detail for ileostomy-related complications?

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Laura Sadocchi; Cesare Ruffolo; Maurizio Iacobone; Teresa Filosa; Daniela Prando; Lino Polese; Mauro Frego; Davide F D'Amico; Imerio Angriman
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.