Literature DB >> 10191579

Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage--a clinical and radiological study.

H Wehrbein1, B R Merz, P Diedrich.   

Abstract

When maximal anchorage is required during orthodontic treatment, additional aids are often needed to support the anchoring teeth. While intra-oral aids may be limited in their anchorage potential, extra-oral anchoring aids are often rejected by the patients. Endosseous implants may therefore be a valuable alternative for stable intra-oral anchorage. However, the possibility of using conventional implants is insufficient, e.g. for treating purely orthodontic patients with full dentition or where extraction sites are to be closed. Therefore, the mid-sagittal area of the palate is an alternative insertion site for the placement of implants for orthodontic anchorage. The limited bone height in this area inspired this comparison between bone thickness in the implantation site as verified by probing during the implantation of Straumann Ortho-system implants, and thickness as measured on the lateral cephalogram. The results suggest that vertical bone support is at least 2 mm higher than apparent on the cephalogram. In none of 12 patients was a perforation to the nasal cavity found. However, in five subjects the implant projected into the nasal cavity on the post-operative cephalogram. These results were supported by the study of the projections of palate and wires in wire-marked skulls where the wires were placed bilaterally on the nasal floor and on the nasal crest. It is therefore concluded that the mid-sagittal area of the palate lends sufficient bony support for the implantation of small implants (4-6 mm endosseous length, diameter 3.3 mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10191579     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.1.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Osteodynamics around orthodontically loaded short maxillary implants. An experimental pilot study.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; M Yildirim; P Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Skeletal anchorage for everybody? a questionnaire study on frequency of use and clinical indications in daily practice.

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Intraoral Molar Distalization with Intraosseous Mini Screw.

Authors:  Mihri Amasyalı; Fidan Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu; Uğur Oflaz
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-01-11

Review 4.  Two-dimensional radiographs versus cone-beam computed tomography in planning mini-implant placement: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela-Franco-da Rosa Caetano; Mariana-Quirino-Silveira Soares; Luciana-Butini Oliveira; José-Luiz-Cintra Junqueira; Monikelly-do Carmo-Chagas Nascimento
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Mini-implants in the anchorage armamentarium: new paradigms in the orthodontics.

Authors:  Masaru Yamaguchi; Toshihiro Inami; Ko Ito; Kazutaka Kasai; Yasuhiro Tanimoto
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-05

6.  Palatal bone thickness measured by palatal index method using cone-beam computed tomography in nonorthodontic patients for placement of mini-implants.

Authors:  W S Manjula; R V Murali; S Kishore Kumar; Faizal Tajir; K Mahalakshmi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

7.  Relationship between maturation indices and morphology of the midpalatal suture obtained using cone-beam computed tomography images.

Authors:  Hong-Ik Jang; Sang-Cheol Kim; Jong-Moon Chae; Kyung-Hwa Kang; Jin-Woo Cho; Na-Young Chang; Keun-Young Lee; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Evaluation of total bone and cortical bone thickness of the palate for temporary anchorage device insertion.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Wei-Cheng Lin; Meng-Yen Chen; Hung-Chih Chang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.080

9.  Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the midpalatal suture region to facilitate orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Song-Hee Oh; Sae Rom Lee; Jin-Young Choi; Seong-Hun Kim; Eui-Hwan Hwang; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness in patients with normal and open vertical skeletal configurations using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Piyoros Suteerapongpun; Tanapan Wattanachai; Apirum Janhom; Polbhat Tripuwabhrut; Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.