Literature DB >> 10187937

Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients.

E M Raynor1, M F Williams, R G Martindale, E S Porubsky.   

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an effective method for providing alimentation in patients with upper aerodigestive tract carcinoma. Multiple complications of this procedure have been reported, ranging from leakage around the tube to tumor seeding of the abdominal cavity. This study was undertaken to determine whether the timing of PEG tube placement with respect to primary tumor extirpation led to a difference in the number and severity of observed complications. The medical records of 43 patients with head and neck carcinoma who had PEG tubes placed from 1995 to 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons of timing of PEG tube placement, complication, location, and stage of the primary tumor were performed. In addition, the use of adjuvant therapy with respect to the time of PEG tube placement and complications was evaluated. Of these, 23% were done before and 30% during surgery at the time of primary tumor resection (9 of 13 were after primary removal). One patient had an intraabdominal abscess. Minor complications occurred in 15 of 43 patients (35%) and included granulation tissue at the PEG site, leakage, and tube displacement. Eight of the 9 patients who underwent intraoperative PEG after tumor resection had no complications. Patients who underwent PEG during or after surgery had significantly fewer complications than those who underwent preoperative PEG or had unresectable tumors (P = 0.038). The largest number of complications occurred in patients who underwent preoperative PEG (57%) followed by patients whose tumors were unresectable (31%). There was no statistical difference with regard to tumor location or postoperative x-ray therapy in PEG complications. This study demonstrates that PEG tube placement after tumor resection has the lowest incidence of postoperative complications. Performing PEGs intraoperatively after tumor resection can prevent the need for additional anesthesia to provide alimentation in patients with upper aerodigestive tract carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10187937     DOI: 10.1053/hn.1999.v120.a91408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  10 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: indications, techniques, complications and results.

Authors:  Barbara F Zuercher; Pierre Grosjean; Philippe Monnier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Indications, complications and long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Fatih Ermis; Melih Ozel; Kemal Oncu; Yusuf Yazgan; Levent Demirturk; Ahmet Kemal Gurbuz; Taner Akyol; Hasan Nazik
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: predictors of 30-day complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality.

Authors:  David M Richards; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Gaurav Arora; Sushovan Guha; Alexander A Dekovich
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Gustavo Francisco de Souza e Mello; Hannah Pitanga Lukashok; Gilmara Coelho Meine; Isabele Avila Small; Roberto Luiz Teixeira de Carvalho; Denise Peixoto Guimarães; Gilberto Reynaldo Mansur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patterns of prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement in head and neck cancer patients: a consideration of the significance of social support and practice variation.

Authors:  Julie L Locher; James A Bonner; William R Carroll; Jimmy J Caudell; Jeroan J Allison; Meredith L Kilgore; Christine S Ritchie; Gabriel S Tajeu; Ya Yuan; David L Roth
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Effect of oral nutritional supplementation on weight loss and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube rates in patients treated with radiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Haidy Lee; Carole Havrila; Vikki Bravo; Kellie Shantz; Kellie Diaz; James Larner; Paul Read
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Pharyngocutaneous fistula as an alternative access route for inserting a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Louise Deluiz Verdolin Di Palma; Gustavo Francisco de Souza E Mello; Cindy Lis Granados; Ricardo Dardengo Glória; Caroline Sauter Dalbem; Rolantre Lopes da Cruz; Ana Carolina Maron Ayres; Renata Sofia Camara Lisboa; Alexandre Dias Pelosi; Maria Aparecida Ferreira; Gilberto Reynaldo Mansur; Simone Guaraldi da Silva; Theresa Christina Damian Ribeiro; Fernando Luiz Dias
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-07-06

8.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kristin Lang; Rami A ElShafie; Sati Akbaba; Ronald Koschny; Nina Bougatf; Denise Bernhardt; Stefan E Welte; Sebastian Adeberg; Matthias Häfner; Steffen Kargus; Peter K Plinkert; Jürgen Debus; Stefan Rieken
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site metastasis from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Andrew T Huang; Alexandros Georgolios; Sasa Espino; Brian Kaplan; James Neifeld; Evan R Reiter
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  An unusual complication following radiological percutaneous gastrostomy.

Authors:  Tonny Veenith; Manasi Bhagwat; Andrew Bailey
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2008-08-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.