| Literature DB >> 10183266 |
F A Esbensen1, E P Deschenes, R E Vogel, J West, K Arboit, L Harris.
Abstract
To date, most school-based research has used passive parental consent. However, the Family Privacy Protection Act of 1995 aims to change these requirements. The proposed legislation requires written parental consent if minors are to be asked "sensitive" questions as part of any program or activity funded in whole or in part by the federal government. This act is representative of a growing trend toward restricting research involving minors. Whether or not this act is passed by Congress, two lines of concern are highlighted by this legislation. The first deals with ethical issues surrounding consent procedures. For instance, are parental rights compromised when active consent is not mandated? A second line of inquiry pertains to the effect of active consent procedures on response rates and sample bias. In this article, the authors discuss ethical issues surrounding passive and active consent procedures and then report response rates from two projects in which active consent procedures were implemented.Keywords: Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Family Privacy Protection Act 1995; Legal Approach
Mesh:
Year: 1996 PMID: 10183266 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9602000605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eval Rev ISSN: 0193-841X