Literature DB >> 17694161

Differences in Fourth-Graders' Participation Rates Across Four School-Based Nutrition Studies.

Francesca H A Frye, Suzanne Domel Baxter, Mark S Litaker, William O Thompson, Caroline H Guinn, Michelle L Baglio, Nicole M Shaffer.   

Abstract

Federal policy has encouraged researchers to include children in research studies; thus, it is important to report experiences recruiting children to participate in studies. This article compares fourth-graders' participation rates across four school-based nutrition studies conducted in one school district in a southeastern state. For each study, children were observed eating school meals (breakfast and lunch); interviewed regarding dietary intake; and weighed and measured. For Study 1, children from 11 schools received $10 per interview for up to two interviews conducted in the morning at school. For Study 2, children from 10 schools received $25 if interviewed once in the evening, either by telephone or in a van parked outside the child's home. For Study 3, children from three schools received $10 per interview for up to three interviews held in the evening by telephone. For Study 4, children from six schools received $15 per interview for up to two interviews conducted either in the morning or afternoon at school, or in the evening by telephone. Recruitment procedures were similar for all studies.Participation rates were 73% (n=635) for Study 1, 57% (n=432) for Study 2, 66% (n=158) for Study 3, and 71% (n=296) for Study 4. Logistic regression was used to determine whether study (1, 2, 3, 4), race (black, white), or gender (male, female) were significant predictors of participation (agreed, denied). The results indicated that study (p<0.0001), race (p=0.0198), and gender (p=0.0188) were significant predictors, however, no two-factor interactions among these effects were significant. Post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment indicated that agreement to participate for Study 2 was lower (p<0.0001) than that for Studies 1, 3, and 4, which did not differ. Agreement to participate across all four studies was higher for black (69%) than white (63%; p=0.0054) children and for females (69%) than males (64%; p=0.0209). Schools provide a natural environment for nutrition research because school foodservice programs feed millions of children one or two meals (breakfast and/or lunch) each school day. Observations of children eating school meals provide a convenient and relatively unobtrusive means of validating children's dietary recalls. Thus, at some point, most child nutrition professionals are likely to be involved in research either directly (i.e. by conducting studies themselves) or indirectly (i.e. by allowing others access to their school cafeterias to collect data).This paper references the following data:Table 1. Similarities and Differences in the Designs for Each of the Four Studies.Table 2. Number and Percent of Fourth-Grade Children Who Agreed or Denied to Participate by Race and Gender Across all Four Studies Combined.Table 3. Number and Percent of Fourth-Grade Children Who Agreed or Denied to Participate by Gender and Race for Each of the Four Studies Separately.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 17694161      PMCID: PMC1945013     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Nutr Manag        ISSN: 1559-5676


  44 in total

1.  Obtaining written parent permission for school-based health surveys of urban young adolescents.

Authors:  L N O'Donnell; R H Duran; A San Doval; M J Breslin; G M Juhn; A Stueve
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Dietary studies of rural school children in a cardiovascular survey.

Authors:  G C Frank; A W Voors; P E Schilling; G S Berenson
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1977-07

3.  Low accuracy and low consistency of fourth-graders' school breakfast and school lunch recalls.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; William O Thompson; Mark S Litaker; Francesca H A Frye; Caroline H Guinn
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-03

4.  Practical issues in obtaining child assent for research.

Authors:  L L Lindeke; M R Hauck; M Tanner
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.145

5.  A new understanding of consent in pediatric practice: consent, parental permission, and child assent.

Authors:  W G Bartholome
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.132

6.  A method to increase informed consent in school health research.

Authors:  E G Belzer; L McIntyre; C Simpson; S Officer; N Stadey
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.118

7.  Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescents.

Authors:  H H Severson; D V Ary
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Cardiovascular health promotion for elementary school children. The Heart Smart Program.

Authors:  G S Berenson; M L Arbeit; S M Hunter; C C Johnson; T A Nicklas
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: eat well and keep moving.

Authors:  S L Gortmaker; L W Cheung; K E Peterson; G Chomitz; J H Cradle; H Dart; M K Fox; R B Bullock; A M Sobol; G Colditz; A E Field; N Laird
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1999-09

10.  Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: politics, policy, and pragmatics.

Authors:  H Severson; A Biglan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  2 in total

1.  Consent Procedures and Participation Rates in School-Based Intervention and Prevention Research: Using a Multi-Component, Partnership-Based Approach to Recruit Participants.

Authors:  Jessica Blom-Hoffman; Stephen S Leff; Debra L Franko; Elana Weinstein; Kelly Beakley; Thomas J Power
Journal:  School Ment Health       Date:  2009-03-01

2.  Recruitment and retention strategies and methods in the HEALTHY study.

Authors:  K L Drews; J S Harrell; D Thompson; S L Mazzuto; E G Ford; M Carter; D A Ford; Z Yin; A N Jessup; J-B Roullet
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.