Literature DB >> 10182206

Using process data to explain outcomes. An illustration from the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH).

S A McGraw1, D E Sellers, E J Stone, J Bebchuk, E W Edmundson, C C Johnson, K J Bachman, R V Luepker.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use of process evaluation for understanding study outcomes. Data from the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH), a large school-based field trial, are used. Teacher characteristics, measures of classroom curriculum implementation, and competing influences are linked to changes in dietary knowledge, intentions, and self-efficacy of students in the intervention schools. Multiple regression analyses indicate that teacher characteristics did not predict program implementation. Teacher characteristics and program fidelity, or the number of modifications made to the classroom curriculum during implementation, had direct and independent effects on student outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10182206     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9602000304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  23 in total

1.  Design, implementation, and quality control in the Pathways American-Indian multicenter trial.

Authors:  Elaine J Stone; James E Norman; Sally M Davis; Dawn Stewart; Theresa E Clay; Ben Caballero; Timothy G Lohman; David M Murray
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  An impact evaluation of a federal mine safety training regulation on injury rates among US stone, sand, and gravel mine workers: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Celeste Monforton; Richard Windsor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation.

Authors:  Cady Berkel; Anne M Mauricio; Erin Schoenfelder; Irwin N Sandler
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-03

4.  An overview of "The Active by Choice Today" (ACT) trial for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Joel E Williams; Ruth Saunders; Sarah Griffin; Russell Pate; M Lee Van Horn; Alexandra Evans; Brent Hutto; Cheryl L Addy; Gary Mixon; Susan B Sisson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Worksite wellness program implementation: a model of translational effectiveness.

Authors:  Diane L Elliot; David P Mackinnon; Linda Mabry; Yasemin Kisbu-Sakarya; Carol A Defrancesco; Stephany J Coxe; Kerry S Kuehl; Esther L Moe; Linn Goldberg; Kim C Favorite
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Deaf Adolescents' Learning of Cardiovascular Health Information: Sources and Access Challenges.

Authors:  Scott R Smith; Poorna Kushalnagar; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Linking implementation process to intervention outcomes in a middle school obesity prevention curriculum, 'Choice, Control and Change'.

Authors:  Heewon Lee Gray; Isobel R Contento; Pamela A Koch
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-02-19

8.  The tug-of-war: fidelity versus adaptation throughout the health promotion program life cycle.

Authors:  Melissa Bopp; Ruth P Saunders; Diana Lattimore
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2013-06

9.  Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.

Authors:  M Schneider; W J Hall; A E Hernandez; K Hindes; G Montez; T Pham; L Rosen; A Sleigh; D Thompson; S L Volpe; A Zeveloff; A Steckler
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Sarah Griffin; Ruth P Saunders; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Duncan C Meyers; Leslie Mansard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.