BACKGROUND: Pathways was the first multicenter American-Indian school-based study to test the effectiveness of an obesity prevention program promoting healthy eating and physical activity. METHODS: Pathways employed a nested cohort design in which 41 schools were randomized to intervention or control conditions and students within these schools were followed as a cohort (1,704 third graders at baseline). The study's primary endpoint was percent body fat. Secondary endpoints were levels of fat in school lunches; time spent in physical activity; and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding diet and exercise. Quality control (QC) included design of data management systems which provided standardization and quality assurance of data collection and processing. Data QC procedures at study centers included manuals of operation, training and certification, and monitoring of performance. Process evaluation was conducted to monitor dose and fidelity of the interventions. Registration and tracking systems were used for students and schools. RESULTS: No difference in mean percent body fat at fifth grade was found between the intervention and control schools. Percent of calories from fat and saturated fat in school lunches was significantly reduced in the intervention schools as was total energy intake from 24-hour recalls. Significant increases in self-reported physical activity levels and knowledge of healthy behaviors were found for the intervention school students. CONCLUSIONS: The Pathways study results provide evidence demonstrating the role schools can play in public health promotion. Its study design and QC systems and procedures provide useful models for other similar school based multi- or single-site studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pathways was the first multicenter American-Indian school-based study to test the effectiveness of an obesity prevention program promoting healthy eating and physical activity. METHODS: Pathways employed a nested cohort design in which 41 schools were randomized to intervention or control conditions and students within these schools were followed as a cohort (1,704 third graders at baseline). The study's primary endpoint was percent body fat. Secondary endpoints were levels of fat in school lunches; time spent in physical activity; and knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding diet and exercise. Quality control (QC) included design of data management systems which provided standardization and quality assurance of data collection and processing. Data QC procedures at study centers included manuals of operation, training and certification, and monitoring of performance. Process evaluation was conducted to monitor dose and fidelity of the interventions. Registration and tracking systems were used for students and schools. RESULTS: No difference in mean percent body fat at fifth grade was found between the intervention and control schools. Percent of calories from fat and saturated fat in school lunches was significantly reduced in the intervention schools as was total energy intake from 24-hour recalls. Significant increases in self-reported physical activity levels and knowledge of healthy behaviors were found for the intervention school students. CONCLUSIONS: The Pathways study results provide evidence demonstrating the role schools can play in public health promotion. Its study design and QC systems and procedures provide useful models for other similar school based multi- or single-site studies.
Authors: Allan Steckler; Becky Ethelbah; Catherine Jane Martin; Dawn Stewart; Marla Pardilla; Joel Gittelsohn; Elaine Stone; David Fenn; Mary Smyth; Maihan Vu Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: C L Perry; D E Sellers; C Johnson; S Pedersen; K J Bachman; G S Parcel; E J Stone; R V Luepker; M Wu; P R Nader; K Cook Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 1997-12
Authors: Scott Going; Janice Thompson; Stephanie Cano; Dawn Stewart; Elaine Stone; Lisa Harnack; Corleone Hastings; James Norman; Charles Corbin Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Sally M Davis; Theresa Clay; Mary Smyth; Joel Gittelsohn; Vivian Arviso; Hilary Flint-Wagner; Bonnie Holy Rock; Richard A Brice; Lauve Metcalfe; Dawn Stewart; Maihan Vu; Elaine J Stone Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Anna Zamora-Kapoor; Adam Omidpanah; Lonnie A Nelson; Alice A Kuo; Raymond Harris; Dedra S Buchwald Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Emily J Tomayko; Ronald J Prince; Kate A Cronin; Tassy Parker; Kyungmann Kim; Vernon M Grant; Judith N Sheche; Alexandra K Adams Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: R G McMurray; S Bassin; R Jago; S Bruecker; E L Moe; T Murray; S L Mazzuto; S L Volpe Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Sally M Davis; Sarah G Sanders; Courtney A FitzGerald; Patricia C Keane; Glenda F Canaca; Renee Volker-Rector Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Sheila Fleischhacker; Erica Roberts; Ricky Camplain; Kelly R Evenson; Joel Gittelsohn Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2015-11-16
Authors: Douglas A Gentile; Greg Welk; Joey C Eisenmann; Rachel A Reimer; David A Walsh; Daniel W Russell; Randi Callahan; Monica Walsh; Sarah Strickland; Katie Fritz Journal: BMC Med Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 8.775