Literature DB >> 10168028

The effect of pharmacoeconomics on company research and development decisions.

H Grabowski1.   

Abstract

There is a strong rationale for integrating pharmacoeconomics into research and development (R&D) project selection and termination decisions. The average cost for the typical new drug introduction now exceeds $US300 million. Furthermore, a growing proportion of phase III projects are terminated because of economic factors relative to efficacy and safety concerns. While the use of pharmacoeconomic studies by payers is still evolving, the pressures on firms to show that new products are cost effective will only intensify in future periods. Accordingly, it is important for firms to begin analysing the cost effectiveness of new drug candidates early in the R&D process. The cost effectiveness of a new therapy can be simulated prior to clinical testing using different assumptions about the efficacy, tolerability, pricing and formulation of the new therapy. These models can be refined and updated as data become available from clinical testing and other sources. A key objective is to make uncompetitive projects fail sooner while channelling development resources to projects with high expected returns. Cost-effectiveness analysis should be an integral component of the firms's strategic action plan and its return on investment analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10168028     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  14 in total

1.  The iterative use of economic evaluation as part of the process of health technology assessment.

Authors:  M Sculpher; M Drummond; M Buxton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-01

Review 2.  Returns to R&D on new drug introductions in the 1980s.

Authors:  H G Grabowski; J M Vernon
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Strategic use of pharmacoeconomic research in early drug development and global pricing.

Authors:  K Clemens; L P Garrison; A Jones; F Macdonald
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Longer patents for increased generic competition in the US. The Waxman-Hatch Act after one decade.

Authors:  H Grabowski; J Vernon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Managed care pharmacy, socioeconomic assessments and drug adoption decisions.

Authors:  A Lyles; B R Luce; A M Rentz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Success rates for new drugs entering clinical testing in the United States.

Authors:  J A DiMasi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. 1968.

Authors:  H Raiffa
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  Current status of economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community: report of the network. The EC Network on the Methodology of Economic Appraisal of Health Technology.

Authors:  L Davies; D Coyle; M Drummond
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  New drug development in the United States from 1963 to 1992.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; M A Seibring; L Lasagna
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and vindesine plus cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner; D M Neighbors; P A McSorley; T Le Chevalier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

1.  The distribution of sales revenues from pharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  H G Grabowski; J Vernon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

Authors:  D A Hughes; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Emerging role of pharmacoeconomics in the research and development decision-making process.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; E Caglarcan; M Wood-Armany
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The dilemma of new drugs. Are costs rising faster than effectiveness?

Authors:  J Mason; N Freemantle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Role of pharmacoeconomic analysis in R&D decision making: when, where, how?

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  An evaluation of the cost effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) relative to the number of organ system failures.

Authors:  Madeline Betancourt; Peggy S McKinnon; R Michael Massanari; Salmaan Kanji; David Bach; John W Devlin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Early decision-analytic modeling - a case study on vascular closure devices.

Authors:  Alina Brandes; Moritz F Sinner; Stefan Kääb; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The premarket assessment of the cost-effectiveness of a predictive technology "Straticyte™" for the early detection of oral cancer: a decision analytic model.

Authors:  S Khoudigian-Sinani; G Blackhouse; M Levine; L Thabane; D O'Reilly
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-10-02

Review 9.  Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Maarten J IJzerman; Hendrik Koffijberg; Elisabeth Fenwick; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  A Scoping Review of Different Methods of Assessing the Impact of New Medical Technologies at Early Stages of Development.

Authors:  Zahra Goudarzi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Abbas Kebriaeezadeh; Reza Yousefi Zenouz; Akbar Abdollahi Asl; Nader Tavakoli
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2021-10-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.