Literature DB >> 10179700

The dilemma of new drugs. Are costs rising faster than effectiveness?

J Mason1, N Freemantle.   

Abstract

This century has seen a phenomenal growth in the development, understanding and use of pharmaceuticals. Additionally, this period has seen the balance of the treatment needs of patients shift dramatically from infectious to cardiovascular and cancer diseases, and from infancy and middle-age to old age. The value of modern pharmaceuticals to society is undoubted. However, the benefits in terms of health gain, when adequately evaluated, are often more modest than first supposed, and are often achieved at considerable costs and sometimes considerable risks to patients. Data are seldom adequate to attempt a robust evaluation of the cost effectiveness of drugs and compare how cost effectiveness may have changed over time. Rapid increases in development costs coupled with the increasing focus on chronic and old-age diseases make it probable that the cost effectiveness of new drugs is broadly declining, but such a conclusion should be interpreted with caution. The big challenge for the next century with its likely genetic and biotechnological discoveries, bringing as yet unforeseen benefits, risks and costs, is to radically improve the manner in which new drugs are evaluated and diffuse into health systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10179700     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199813060-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  13 in total

1.  North of England evidence-based guideline development project: summary version of guidelines for the choice of antidepressants for depression in primary care. North of England Anti-depressant Guideline Development Group.

Authors:  M Eccles; N Freemantle; J Mason
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Rising research and development costs for new drugs in a cost containment environment.

Authors:  J A DiMasi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The effect of pharmacoeconomics on company research and development decisions.

Authors:  H Grabowski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The new drug approvals of 1987, 1988, and 1989: trends in drug development.

Authors:  K I Kaitin; P A DiCerbo; L Lasagna
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Guidelines on drug treatments for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  S Lovestone; N Graham; R Howard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Drug treatments for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  C A Kelly; R J Harvey; H Cayton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-08

7.  Reporting guidelines for economic studies.

Authors:  J Mason; M Drummond
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Donepezil Study Group.

Authors:  S L Rogers; M R Farlow; R S Doody; R Mohs; L T Friedhoff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Alzheimer's disease: the burden of the illness in England.

Authors:  A Gray; P Fenn
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1993

10.  The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a US Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. The Donepezil Study Group.

Authors:  S L Rogers; L T Friedhoff
Journal:  Dementia       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec
View more
  1 in total

1.  Challenges to the economic evaluation of new biotechnological interventions in healthcare.

Authors:  J Mason
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.