Literature DB >> 8574208

Quality of life: an overview of the concept and measures.

S Dedhiya1, S X Kong.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes the concepts and measures of quality of life. Although numerous attempts have been made to conceptualize and operationalize quality of life, there has been no universally accepted standard for the study design, data collection and data analysis of studies that use quality of life as an outcome measure. Quality of life has been defined either as a measure of happiness and satisfaction with life, or goal achievement, or social utility. However, most studies conceptualize and measure quality of life as a composite that consists of several domains. There are two approaches to the measurement of quality of life, namely, the psychometric approach and the utility approach. A quality of life measure can be either generic or disease-specific. High reliability and validity are important criteria for a credible quality of life instrument. Published clinical studies which use quality of life as an outcome measure have to be assessed on the basis of the appropriateness of the study design, the validity of study results and the applicability of the quality of life measure to the specific patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8574208     DOI: 10.1007/bf01879707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  31 in total

1.  A scale for the measurement of quality of life in adults with asthma.

Authors:  G B Marks; S M Dunn; A J Woolcock
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Development of a quality of life index for patients with cancer.

Authors:  C E Ferrans
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine.

Authors:  R A McCormick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Measuring quality of life: risks and benefits.

Authors:  H Schipper; M Levitt
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

6.  The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations.

Authors:  S M Hunt; S P McKenna; J McEwen; J Williams; E Papp
Journal:  Soc Sci Med A       Date:  1981-05

7.  Quality of life: an ideological critique.

Authors:  M Edlund; L R Tancredi
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.416

8.  Benefit and cost analysis in geriatric care. Turning age discrimination into health policy.

Authors:  J Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A new scale for assessing patients' psychosocial adjustment to medical illness.

Authors:  G R Morrow; R J Chiarello; L R Derogatis
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Minor Symptoms Evaluation (MSE) Profile--a questionnaire for assessment of subjective CNS-related symptoms.

Authors:  C Dahlöf
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl       Date:  1990
View more
  1 in total

1.  Criterion validity of the ARthritis Treatment Satisfaction (ARTS) questionnaire: patient satisfaction with treatment and need for switching therapy.

Authors:  Javier Rejas; Jordi Monfort; Miguel A Campillo; Miguel A Ruiz; Antonio Pardo; Javier Soto
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.