Literature DB >> 10150154

Formulary considerations in selection of beta-blockers.

K C Yedinak1.   

Abstract

Selection of beta-adrenergic blockers for formulary addition can be a difficult task, especially with the increasing availability of new beta-blockers, as well as the numerous differences in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of currently available agents. Nevertheless, appropriate evaluation of the important characteristics of beta-blockers should allow selection of the most cost-effective agents for formulary addition. Most importantly, differences in efficacy, product formulation and cost should be carefully considered when making formulary decisions. Notably, evidence from clinical trials indicates differences in efficacy among beta-blockers for post-myocardial infarction prophylaxis, situational anxiety, essential tremor, thyrotoxicosis, migraine prophylaxis and prevention of bleeding associated with oesophageal varices. For many clinical situations, it is also important to select an effective agent that is available in both an oral and intravenous formulation, especially for cardioprotection after acute myocardial infarction and for use in supraventricular arrhythmias. In addition, availability of sustained release products and generic formulations should be considered for their potential to increase compliance and decrease cost, respectively. Comparative drug costs, as well as costs associated with decreased compliance, should also be carefully evaluated. Differences in beta-receptor selectivity, duration of action and presence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) are also important considerations in the selection of beta-blockers for formulary consideration. Although degree of selectivity is relative, beta 1-selective agents may be less likely to induce bronchospasm in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and may be less likely to affect glucose homeostasis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Duration of action of a beta-blocker is an important consideration for evaluation of efficacy throughout the recommended dosage interval. In addition, beta-blockers with a long duration of action can often be administered once or twice daily, potentially leading to increased compliance and thereby improved effectiveness and economic efficiency. The presence of ISA is an important consideration because certain beta-blockers with ISA may be less effective than those without ISA for certain indications. Factors considered to be less important when making formulary decisions of choice of beta-blockers include the route of elimination, lipophilicity and presence of membrane stabilising activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10150154     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199304020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  129 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacology of vasodilatory beta-blocking drugs.

Authors:  R G Shanks
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Beta-blockers and asthma.

Authors:  P B Decalmer; S S Chatterjee; J M Cruickshank; M K Benson; G M Sterling
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1978-02

3.  Secondary prevention after high-risk acute myocardial infarction with low-dose acebutolol.

Authors:  J P Boissel; A Leizorovicz; H Picolet; J C Peyrieux
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  A comparison of once daily bisoprolol, 5 and 10 mg, and atenolol 100 mg in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Authors:  M B Maltz; D S Dymond; A W Nathan; A J Camm
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Beta-adrenoceptor blockers and the blood-brian barrier.

Authors:  G Neil-Dwyer; J Bartlett; J McAinsh; J M Cruickshank
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Primary prevention with metoprolol in patients with hypertension. Mortality results from the MAPHY study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; I Warnold; G Olsson; J Tuomilehto; D Elmfeldt; G Berglund
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prolongation of survival in congestive cardiomyopathy by beta-receptor blockade.

Authors:  K Swedberg; A Hjalmarson; F Waagstein; I Wallentin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-06-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Therapeutic effects of pindolol and nifedipine in patients with stable angina pectoris and asymptomatic resting ischemia.

Authors:  G Cocco; C Strozzi; D Chu; R Amrein; E Castagnoli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiol       Date:  1979-07

9.  Hyperglycemia associated with propranolol and chlorpropamide coadministration.

Authors:  R J Holt; J D Gaskins
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug

10.  Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-07-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Choosing the right beta-blocker. A guide to selection.

Authors:  J R Hampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Celiprolol. An evaluation of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  C J Dunn; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.