Literature DB >> 2195860

Secondary prevention after high-risk acute myocardial infarction with low-dose acebutolol.

J P Boissel1, A Leizorovicz, H Picolet, J C Peyrieux.   

Abstract

Acebutolol et Prévention Secondaire de l'Infarctus (APSI), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, was designed to test long-term acebutolol, 200 mg twice daily, a beta blocker with mild intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, in the prevention of late death in high-risk postacute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. APSI was planned because patients with a death rate greater than 20% have not been enrolled in significant numbers in previous trials and in such high-risk patients, it remained to be proven that beta blockers have a beneficial effect. Patients with an expected average risk of greater than 20% were to be selected based on clinical criteria. At the time of the second interim analysis, the placebo group 1-year mortality was much lower than expected (12%). The ethical board recommended to stop the trial: 309 patients had been allocated to placebo, 298 to acebutolol. The average delay between onset of symptoms and inclusion was 10.5 days. The average follow-up was 318 days after inclusion. About the same number of patients were discontinued from study treatment in both groups. All patients were included in the analysis. There were 17 deaths in the acebutolol group and 34 in the placebo group, a 48% decrease (p = 0.019). The vascular mortality decreased by 58% (p = 0.006), the highest ever observed with a beta blocker. All cardiovascular causes of death, including congestive heart failure, were less frequent in the acebutolol group. Although the objective was not achieved, APSI patients were at a higher risk than the average of the 9 previous trials with beta blockers (12% instead of 7%). In addition, the total mortality reduction did not decrease in 9 subgroups with increasing mortality risk from 2 to 23%. APSI shows that moderately severe postAMI patients can benefit from a beta-blocking treatment and a beta-blocker with mild intrinsic sympathomimetic activity can be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2195860     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90831-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

Review 1.  Potential interests of heart rate lowering drugs.

Authors:  T Laperche; D Logeart; A Cohen-Solal; R Gourgon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Drugs used in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: case presentation.

Authors:  S Maxwell; W S Waring
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: what is the evidence? 2: Beta-blockers.

Authors:  J M Wright
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-07-25       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  beta blocker treatment and other prognostic variables in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: evidence from the AIRE study.

Authors:  K S Spargias; A S Hall; D C Greenwood; S G Ball
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Treatment of hypertension in older adults.

Authors:  J A Lewis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-09

6.  Treatment of hypertension in older adults.

Authors:  J M Cruickshank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-11

Review 7.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Recent advances in cardiology.

Authors:  C F Shakespeare; D J Coltart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Sick population--treated population: the need for a better definition. The VALIDATA Group.

Authors:  J P Collet; J P Boissel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Effects of beta receptor antagonists in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction: double blind comparison of metoprolol and xamoterol.

Authors:  H Persson; E Rythe'n-Alder; A Melcher; L Erhardt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.