Literature DB >> 7528129

Choosing the right beta-blocker. A guide to selection.

J R Hampton1.   

Abstract

beta-Blockers have been in clinical use for 30 years, and have an accepted role in (among others) the treatment of high blood pressure, the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and the treatment of arrhythmias. Their place in the treatment of heart failure is currently under investigation. The drugs available in the 1970s and early 1980s were subjected to intense investigation. A new generation of beta-blockers, including some such as carvedilol and bucindolol, with vasodilating properties, is now appearing. As yet these later agents have not been the subject of large clinical trials. Clinical practice involves the treatment of individual patients with defined dosages of particular drugs. It is, therefore, not acceptable to base practice on theories derived from the clinical pharmacology of a particular drug, on the results of small trials or on a meta-analysis of results from a number of trials that were individually inadequate. Clinical practice must follow the results of large-scale trials in defined populations. The major trials in hypertension, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and heart failure provide the best evidence for the use of individual beta-blockers in each of these clinical situations. In patients with high blood pressure, beta-blockers do not seem to have any particular advantage over other hypotensive agents. In myocardial infarction, relatively late use of a beta-blocker undoubtedly reduces fatality, though the value of early treatment is less clear. beta-Blockers are not powerful antiarrhythmics, but they do appear to prevent sudden death. Their possible role in heart failure is perhaps the most interesting current field of beta-blocker research. There are very few comparative studies of beta-blockers, and it is difficult to make precise recommendations. None of the new generation of beta-blockers has yet been used in a trial that is large enough trial for any of them to be accepted for routine use in preference to older drugs. The use of individual beta-blockers, as with any drug, should follow the results of clinical trials. Propranolol and atenolol have been studied most intensely in hypertension. For secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, the evidence is best for timolol. Sotalol is probably the best antiarrhythmic among the beta-blockers. Whether any individual beta-blocker is best for heart failure remains to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7528129     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199448040-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  102 in total

1.  Atrial arrhythmias.

Authors:  F D Murgatroyd; A J Camm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-05-22       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Secondary prevention after high-risk acute myocardial infarction with low-dose acebutolol.

Authors:  J P Boissel; A Leizorovicz; H Picolet; J C Peyrieux
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Long-term beta-blockade in dilated cardiomyopathy. Effects of short- and long-term metoprolol treatment followed by withdrawal and readministration of metoprolol.

Authors:  F Waagstein; K Caidahl; I Wallentin; C H Bergh; A Hjalmarson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Hypertension management in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Six-year intervention results for men in special intervention and usual care groups.

Authors:  R H Grimm; J D Cohen; W M Smith; L Falvo-Gerard; J D Neaton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-07

6.  Cardiovascular risk and risk factors in a randomized trial of treatment based on the beta-blocker oxprenolol: the International Prospective Primary Prevention Study in Hypertension (IPPPSH). The IPPPSH Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Effect of oxprenolol on ventricular arrhythmias: the European Infarction Study experience.

Authors:  K P Bethge; D Andresen; J P Boissel; E R von Leitner; J C Peyrieux; R Schröder; U Tietze
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  GISSI-2: a factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-07-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Long-term beta-blocker vasodilator therapy improves cardiac function in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a double-blind, randomized study of bucindolol versus placebo.

Authors:  E M Gilbert; J L Anderson; D Deitchman; F G Yanowitz; J B O'Connell; D G Renlund; M Bartholomew; P C Mealey; P Larrabee; M R Bristow
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Celiprolol. An evaluation of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  C J Dunn; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Cardiac cAMP-PKA Signaling Compartmentalization in Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Colombe; Guillaume Pidoux
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  The therapeutic efficacy of propranolol in children with recurrent primary epistaxis.

Authors:  Bojko Bjelakovic; Mila Bojanovic; Stevo Lukic; Ljiljana Saranac; Vladislav Vukomanovic; Sergej Prijic; Nikola Zivkovic; Dusica Randjelovic
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.