Literature DB >> 10146939

Quality of life evaluation of antihypertensive drugs.

C J Bulpitt1, A E Fletcher.   

Abstract

Eleven studies (10 randomised controlled trials and 1 large open study) that evaluated quality of life (QOL) are reviewed. The areas of QOL measured by the studies are compared and a consensus is reported that health-related QOL measures in patients with hypertension should include: symptomatic and psychological well-being, activity (work, leisure, sleep, sexual activity and social participation), cognitive function and life satisfaction. Recommended methods for measuring these aspects of QOL are noted. Seven studies included atenolol as 1 of the treatments and the effects of this drug on QOL are reviewed. The drug appears to maintain QOL as well as the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, enalapril and cilazapril. One trial also suggests that verapamil maintains QOL as well as atenolol, although this was not suggested by the nonrandomised study. Nifedipine slow release (SR) and propranolol both fared worse than atenolol in 2 separate trials, but 1 trial suggested that nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) was preferred to atenolol in terms of QOL. In the latter study, however, only patients completing the prescribed therapy revealed a preference for nifedipine GITS; this was absent in an intention-to-treat analysis. The rate of discontinuation of nifedipine therapy was high, underlining the necessity for an intention-to-treat analysis in trials assessing QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10146939     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  18 in total

1.  The measurement of quality of life in hypertensive patients: a practical approach.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Antihypertensive therapy and quality of life: a comparison of atenolol, captopril, enalapril and propranolol.

Authors:  S S Steiner; A J Friedhoff; B L Wilson; J R Wecker; J P Santo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; R S Lipman; L Covi
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1973-01

4.  A controlled study of the effects of antidepressants on sexual function.

Authors:  W M Harrison; J Stewart; A A Ehrhardt; J Rabkin; P McGrath; M Liebowitz; F M Quitkin
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1985

5.  Hypertensive black men and women. Quality of life and effects of antihypertensive medications. Black Hypertension Quality of Life Multicenter Trial Group.

Authors:  S H Croog; B W Kong; S Levine; M R Weir; R M Baume; E Saunders
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-08

6.  Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  A L Herrick; P C Waller; K E Berkin; S D Pringle; J S Callender; M P Robertson; J G Findlay; G D Murray; J L Reid; A R Lorimer
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Managing hypertension in family practice: a nationwide collaborative study of the use of four antihypertensives in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A report from CEN. Clinical Experience Network.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep

8.  Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report.

Authors:  M M Weissman; S Bothwell
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1976-09

9.  The effects of verapamil and propranolol on quality of life in hypertension.

Authors:  A E Fletcher; P C Chester; C M Hawkins; A N Latham; L A Pike; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in pharmaceutical evaluation: forging progress and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  D L Patrick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Enalapril: a review of quality-of-life and pharmacoeconomic aspects of its use in heart failure and mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  M I Wilde; H M Bryson; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D H Peters; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  A risk-benefit analysis for the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Diuretic induced changes in symptoms and quality of life.

Authors:  B Silke
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-08

Review 6.  The relationship between quality of life and adherence to treatment.

Authors:  M I Nunes
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Effect of antihypertensive agents on quality of life in the elderly.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Annalisa Zoppi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Quality of life in the treatment of hypertension. The effect of calcium antagonists.

Authors:  A Fletcher; C Bulpitt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Goals of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  G E McVeigh; J Flack; R Grimm
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.546

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.