Literature DB >> 2539017

Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.

A L Herrick1, P C Waller, K E Berkin, S D Pringle, J S Callender, M P Robertson, J G Findlay, G D Murray, J L Reid, A R Lorimer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Short-term therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for hypertension is effective and well tolerated, and compared with beta blockers, may cause fewer adverse reactions. Furthermore, enalapril has been observed to have a greater effect on systolic blood pressure than beta blockers. We therefore decided to compare the ACE inhibitor enalapril and the beta blocker atenolol as monotherapy in a double-blind study of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After a four-week placebo run-in period, 162 patients were allocated randomly to receive atenolol (50 to 100 mg daily) or enalapril (20 to 40 mg daily) for 12 weeks. To assess the influence of these drugs on quality of life, a series of psychologic tests was performed, and a subset of patients also underwent treadmill exercise and pulmonary function tests.
RESULTS: In 147 patients who completed the study, enalapril reduced supine blood pressure by 19/12 mm Hg, compared with 9/7 mm Hg for atenolol (p less than 0.001/p less than 0.005). The modest blood pressure response to atenolol was not due to poor compliance. A target blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or less was achieved by 35 percent of enalapril-treated atenolol (p less than 0.01). The frequency and severity of adverse effects with the two drugs were similar, and few important differences emerged from the quality-of-life assessments.
CONCLUSION: At the doses used, enalapril induced a greater short-term blood pressure response than atenolol; long-term studies of its safety and efficacy are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2539017     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90340-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  J S Callender
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Newer beta blockers and the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  D McAreavey; R Vermeulen; J I Robertson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 4.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.

Authors:  I Côté; J P Grégoire; J Moisan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Quality of life evaluation of antihypertensive drugs.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment: metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics.

Authors:  M Johannesson; J Wikstrand; B Jönsson; G Berglund; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Peripheral vasoconstriction induced by β-adrenoceptor blockers: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles Khouri; Thomas Jouve; Sophie Blaise; Patrick Carpentier; Jean-Luc Cracowski; Matthieu Roustit
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Quality-of-life instruments in hypertension.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Enalapril versus atenolol in the treatment of hypertensive smokers.

Authors:  M Kotamäki; V Manninen; K E Laustiola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.