Literature DB >> 10146888

Time preference for health gains versus health losses.

L D MacKeigan1, L N Larson, J R Draugalis, J L Bootman, L R Burns.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine whether people devalue further health gains differently from future health losses. 108 subjects in various states of health were randomised to groups that rated their preference for a hypothetical health gain or loss of variable duration and delay, in the condition of arthritis. Direction and duration of the hypothetical future health change had an interactive effect on time preference (p less than 0.001). For the health gain, devaluation due to delay was consistent across durations. For the health loss, devaluation depended on duration; the long-duration loss was devalued with delay while the fleeting loss was inflated. These findings cast doubt on the assumptions of positive time preference and constant rate discounting that underlie the classical model of discounting. They provide support for a theory of intertemporal choice which posits that vivid, fleeting, future events engender 'anticipation utility' which attenuates positive time preference. Our findings suggest that standard practices for discounting future health outcomes in economic evaluations of arthritis and possibly other conditions may need to be re-examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146888     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  10 in total

1.  Discounting in cost-effectiveness analysis of healthcare programmes.

Authors:  D A Katz; H G Welch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Preference based outcome measures for economic evaluation of drug interventions: quality adjusted life years (QALYs) versus healthy years equivalents (HYEs).

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Discounting of health benefits in the pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapies: an issue for debate?

Authors:  D Coyle; K Tolley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects.

Authors:  D G Froberg; R L Kane
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Time preference for health in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  J Lipscomb
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies.

Authors:  D G Froberg; R L Kane
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values. Women's decisions during childbirth.

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Patient compliance behavior: the effects of time on patients' values of treatment regimens.

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski; G B Northcraft
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Cocaine dependent individuals discount future rewards more than future losses for both cocaine and monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Natalie R Bruner; Patrick S Johnson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.

Authors:  Giles W Story; Ivo Vlaev; Ben Seymour; Ara Darzi; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  The delay effect on outcome evaluation: results from an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Chen Qu; Yunyun Huang; Yuru Wang; Yu-Xia Huang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Pain now or later: an outgrowth account of pain-minimization.

Authors:  Hong-Yue Sun; Ai-Mei Li; Shuai Chen; Dan Zhao; Li-Lin Rao; Zhu-Yuan Liang; Shu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Good things come to those who wait-Decreasing impatience for health gains and losses.

Authors:  Stefan A Lipman; Arthur E Attema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Delay discounting of money and health outcomes, and adherence to policy guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jakub M Krawiec; Szymon Mizak; Marco Tagliabue; Wojciech Białaszek
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-22

7.  A neuro-computational account of procrastination behavior.

Authors:  Raphaël Le Bouc; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Efficient Institutions and Effective Deterrence: On Timing and Uncertainty of Formal Sanctions.

Authors:  Johannes Buckenmaier; Eugen Dimant; Ann-Christin Posten; Ulrich Schmidt
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2021-07-23

9.  Victims' time discounting 2.5 years after the Wenchuan earthquake: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jin-Zhen Li; Dan-Yang Gui; Chun-Liang Feng; Wen-Zhong Wang; Bo-Qi Du; Tian Gan; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Separate Neural Networks for Gains and Losses in Intertemporal Choice.

Authors:  Yang-Yang Zhang; Lijuan Xu; Zhu-Yuan Liang; Kun Wang; Bing Hou; Yuan Zhou; Shu Li; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.203

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.