Literature DB >> 10146557

Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: illustrative results from a parent sample.

R Spoth1, C Redmond.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to illustrate the application of conjoint analysis, a consumer research technique, using data from a survey of parents' preferences for prevention programs.
DESIGN: This study utilized a one-time, cross-sectional telephone survey.
SETTING: Data were collected from subjects living in economically disadvantaged rural midwestern counties.
SUBJECTS: Subjects were 202 randomly selected parents with preadolescents who indicated interest in family-focused prevention programs. MEASURES: Conjoint analysis software was employed in computer-assisted telephone interviews to evaluate relative preferences for 39 individual features of family-focused prevention programs falling under 11 categories (e.g., program meeting time, facilitator background). The software also guided computer simulations of parent choices among four types of programs.
RESULTS: Findings indicated that meeting time was the most important category of program features. Strongly preferred individual features included meetings scheduled on weekday evenings, instruction by child development specialists, and programs based on extensive research. Two multiple-session programs evaluated via computer simulations incorporated several preferred features and received higher ratings than did single-session programs. Estimated variance z-tests indicated limited differences in perceived importance of program feature categories across sociodemographic subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight a) differences in the relative value parents place on various features of prevention programs in the surveyed population and b) the importance of practical aspects of program delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146557     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-8.2.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  16 in total

1.  Modeling factors influencing enrollment in family-focused preventive intervention research.

Authors:  R Spoth; C Redmond; C Shin
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2000-12

2.  Effects of the "Preparing for the Drug Free Years" curriculum on growth in alcohol use and risk for alcohol use in early adolescence.

Authors:  J Park; R Kosterman; J D Hawkins; K P Haggerty; T E Duncan; S C Duncan; R Spoth
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2000-09

3.  Project Family prevention trials based in community-university partnerships: toward scaled-up preventive interventions.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Cleve Redmond
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2002-09

4.  Modeling the bullying prevention program preferences of educators: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Tracy Vaillancourt; Heather Rimas; Ken Deal; Lesley Cunningham; Kathy Short; Yvonne Chen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-10

5.  Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: the translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework.

Authors:  Richard Spoth; Louise A Rohrbach; Mark Greenberg; Philip Leaf; C Hendricks Brown; Abigail Fagan; Richard F Catalano; Mary Ann Pentz; Zili Sloboda; J David Hawkins
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-08

6.  Promoting Enrollment in Parenting Programs Among a Filipino Population: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Joyce R Javier; Dean M Coffey; Lawrence A Palinkas; Michele D Kipke; Jeanne Miranda; Sheree M Schrager
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Surviving or thriving: quality assurance mechanisms to promote innovation in the development of evidence-based parenting interventions.

Authors:  Matthew R Sanders; James N Kirby
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-04

8.  Recruiting Fathers to Parenting Programs: Advice from Dads and Fatherhood Program Providers.

Authors:  Mary Jo Stahlschmidt; Jennifer Threlfall; Kristen D Seay; Ericka M Lewis; Patricia L Kohl
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Providing information to parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint analysis of professional preferences.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Yvonne Chen; Don H Buchanan; Kathie Sdao-Jarvie
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11

10.  Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Don H Buchanan; Michelle Gold; Katherine Sdao-Jarvie; Michael Boyle
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2008-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.