Literature DB >> 10136822

Evidence for validity of a health status measure in assessing short term outcomes of cholecystectomy.

M J Bardsley1, C W Venables, J Watson, J Goodfellow, P D Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Nottingham health profile (NHP) as an indicator of short term outcome of cholecystectomy.
DESIGN: Prospective assessment of outcome.
SETTING: One teaching hospital. Patients--161 consecutive patients admitted for cholecystectomy between January 1989 and September 1990. MAIN MEASURES: Patients' reported symptoms and self assessed NHP scores before cholecystectomy and at follow up at three and 12 months (76 patients); assessment before admission (19).
RESULTS: Complete data were obtained preoperatively and at three months' follow up from 154 patients; seven did not respond to the follow up questionnaire. 76/84(90%) patients in the study 12 months or more answered the 12 month follow up questionnaire; eight did not respond. Significant changes in score before and at three months after the operation were observed for four of the six dimensions: energy (35.34 v 19.53, p < 0.0001), pain (27.38 v 9.8, p < 0.0001), sleep (26.99 v 17.51, p = 0.0002), and emotional reactions (16.12 v 7.56, p = 0.001). The mean scores for 76 patients followed up at three and 12 months showed little subsequent change. Scores in readmitted patients were all significantly higher, suggesting poor health. Patients with five reported symptoms had significantly worse scores for all dimensions. Scores were similar before cholecystectomy whether the questionnaire was completed before or after admission.
CONCLUSION: The NHP is an appropriate tool for monitoring changes in health after cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10136822      PMCID: PMC1056799          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.1.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  8 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D L Patrick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience.

Authors:  P M Ellwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community.

Authors:  S M Hunt; J McEwen; S P McKenna
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Toward an understanding of patient outcome measurement.

Authors:  J F Fries
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1983-06

6.  Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  N Caine; S C Harrison; L D Sharples; J Wallwork
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-02

7.  The Nottingham Health Profile as a measure of quality of life following combined heart and lung transplantation.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; N R Banner; S Gibson; M H Yacoub
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Quality from the management perspective.

Authors:  C West
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

2.  Comparison of short term outcomes of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Cleary; C W Venables; J Watson; J Goodfellow; P D Wright
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

3.  Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey.

Authors:  A Klassen; R Fitzpatrick; C Jenkinson; T Goodacre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-24

4.  Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

5.  The development and testing of the well-being index for surgical patients (WISP).

Authors:  S P McKenna; L C Doward; D Whalley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Assessing patient-reported outcomes of cholecystectomy in short-stay surgery.

Authors:  Eva Maria Bitzer; Christoph Lorenz; Stefan Nickel; Hans Dörning; Alf Trojan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Symptoms and health status before and six weeks after open cholecystectomy: a European cohort study.ECHSS Group. European Collaborative Health Services Study Group.

Authors:  N A Black; E Thompson; C F Sanderson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy: health status in a blind randomised trial.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Jolanda de Vries; Hein G Gooszen; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.