Literature DB >> 8776311

Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey.

A Klassen1, R Fitzpatrick, C Jenkinson, T Goodacre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the health status of patients before and after breast reduction surgery and to make comparisons with the health status of women in the general population.
DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey sent to patients before and six months after surgery.
SETTING: The three plastic surgery departments in the Oxford Regional Health Authority, during April to August 1993.
SUBJECTS: 166 women (over the age of 16 years) referred for breast reduction; scores from the "short form 36" (SF-36) health questionnaire completed by women in the 1991-2 Oxford healthy life survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status of breast reduction patients before and after surgery as assessed by the SF-36, the 28 item general health questionnaire, and Rosenberg's self esteem scale; comparisons between the health status of breast reduction patients and that of women in the general population; outcome of surgery as assessed retrospectively by patients.
RESULTS: Differences between the health status of breast reduction patients and that of women in the general population were detected by the SF-36 both before and after surgery. Breast reduction surgery produced substantial change in patients' physical, social, and psychological function. The proportion of cases of possible psychiatric morbidity according to the general health questionnaire fell from 41% (22/54) before surgery to 11% (6/54) six months after treatment. Eighty six per cent (50/58) of patients expressed great satisfaction with the surgical result postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: The study provides empirical evidence that supports the inclusion of breast reduction surgery in NHS purchasing contracts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8776311      PMCID: PMC2351844          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7055.454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience.

Authors:  P M Ellwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The significance of treatment effects: the clinical perspective.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D L Patrick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Sensitivity to change of health status measures in a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; K Lawrence; D McWhinnie; J Gordon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson; L Southgate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using Quality of Life indices.

Authors:  R P Cole; V Shakespeare; P Shakespeare; J A Hobby
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1994-03

6.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Evidence for validity of a health status measure in assessing short term outcomes of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M J Bardsley; C W Venables; J Watson; J Goodfellow; P D Wright
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

8.  Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; S Ziebland; C Jenkinson; A Mowat; A Mowat
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

9.  Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?

Authors:  A M Garratt; D A Ruta; M I Abdalla; J K Buckingham; I T Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29
  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? Only a third of women studied completed both questionnaires.

Authors:  J S Vaidya; N Sacks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-07

2.  Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? Interventions requested for psychological reasons should be studied.

Authors:  M Somerville; G Radford; N Hews
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-07

3.  Breast reduction surgery in the UK and Ireland - current trends.

Authors:  O C Iwuagwu; A J Platt; P J Drew
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The development and testing of the well-being index for surgical patients (WISP).

Authors:  S P McKenna; L C Doward; D Whalley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  Roberta J Honigman; Katharine A Phillips; David J Castle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing?

Authors:  David J Castle; Roberta J Honigman; Katharine A Phillips
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Methodology and measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments: a prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Sheila Sprague; Karen Veltri; Eric Duku; William Furlong
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Assessing the effects of changes in care commissioning guidelines at a tertiary centre in London on the provision of NHS-funded procedures of limited clinical effectiveness: an 11-year retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Shafiq Rahman; Benjamin Langridge; Nadine Hachach-Haram; Esther Hansen; Anna Bootle; Nicola Bystrzonowski; Stephen Hamilton; Afshin Mosahebi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Amie Scott; Jennifer Klok; Stefan J Cano
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  'Cosmetic boob jobs' or evidence-based breast surgery: an interpretive policy analysis of the rationing of 'low value' treatments in the English National Health Service.

Authors:  Jill Russell; Deborah Swinglehurst; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.