Literature DB >> 10134545

Validating interpretive arguments for licensure and certification examinations.

M T Kane1.   

Abstract

To validate the interpretation assigned to test scores is to support the rationale for this interpretation. The interpretations for licensure and certification tests involve a sequence of inferences, or an argument, leading from the test score to decisions about licensure or certification. This article examines several possible interpretive arguments for licensure and certification test scores and analyzes the evidence required to support each type of argument. Particular attention is given to a competency-based argument that involves a sequence of several inferences leading from test scores to statements about competence, and then to conclusions about expected performance in practice. Decisions about licensure or certification are based on expected performance in practice.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10134545     DOI: 10.1177/016327879401700202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

1.  An introduction to standard setting methods in dentistry.

Authors:  J Puryer; D O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Assessing professional competence in optometry - a review of the development and validity of the written component of the competency in optometry examination (COE).

Authors:  S Backhouse; N G Chiavaroli; K L Schmid; T McKenzie; A L Cochrane; G Phillips; I Jalbert
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examinations and performance in future practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wenghofer; John Boulet
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2022-08-26

4.  Professionalism and inter-communication skills (ICS): a multi-site validity study assessing proficiency in core competencies and milestones in medical learners.

Authors:  Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Thomas A Waller; Robert P Bonacci; Anem J Nawaz; Joshua J Keith; Anjali Agarwal; John Merfeld; Terri Nordin; Mary Michelle Winscott; Thomas E Belda; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Sally Ann L Pantin; Lawrence W Steinkraus; Thomas J Grau; Kurt B Angstman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.