Literature DB >> 36091726

Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examinations and performance in future practice.

Elizabeth Wenghofer1, John Boulet2.   

Abstract

The purpose of medical licensing examinations is to protect the public from practitioners who do not have adequate knowledge, skills, and abilities to provide acceptable patient care, and therefore evaluating the validity of these examinations is a matter of accountability. Our objective was to discuss the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examinations (MCCQEs) Part I (QE1) and Part II (QE2) in terms of how well they reflect future performance in practice. We examined the supposition that satisfactory performance on the MCCQEs are important determinants of practice performance and, ultimately, patient outcomes. We examined the literature before the implementation of the QE2 (pre-1992), post QE2 but prior to the implementation of the new Blueprint (1992-2018), and post Blueprint (2018-present). The literature suggests that MCCQE performance is predictive of future physician behaviours, that the relationship between examination performance and outcomes did not attenuate with practice experience, and that associations between examination performance and outcomes made sense clinically. While the evidence suggests the MCC qualifying examinations measure the intended constructs and are predictive of future performance, the validity argument is never complete. As new competency requirements emerge, we will need to develop valid and reliable mechanisms for determining practice readiness in these areas.
© 2022 Wenghofer, Boulet; licensee Synergies Partners.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36091726      PMCID: PMC9441123          DOI: 10.36834/cmej.73770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Educ J        ISSN: 1923-1202


  33 in total

1.  Designing and Evaluating Standard-Setting Procedures for Licensure and Certification Tests.

Authors:  M.T. Kane; T.J. Crooks; A.S. Cohen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.853

2.  Ensuring high-quality patient care: the role of accreditation, licensure, specialty certification and revalidation in medicine.

Authors:  John Boulet; Marta van Zanten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Exploring the Relationships Between USMLE Performance and Disciplinary Action in Practice: A Validity Study of Score Inferences From a Licensure Examination.

Authors:  Monica M Cuddy; Aaron Young; Andrew Gelman; David B Swanson; David A Johnson; Gerard F Dillon; Brian E Clauser
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care.

Authors:  Robyn Tamblyn; Michal Abrahamowicz; W Dale Dauphinee; James A Hanley; John Norcini; Nadyne Girard; Paul Grand'Maison; Carlos Brailovsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities.

Authors:  Robyn Tamblyn; Michal Abrahamowicz; Dale Dauphinee; Elizabeth Wenghofer; André Jacques; Daniel Klass; Sydney Smee; David Blackmore; Nancy Winslade; Nadyne Girard; Roxane Du Berger; Ilona Bartman; David L Buckeridge; James A Hanley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Association Between Performance on COMLEX-USA and the American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians In-Service Examination.

Authors:  Kimberly M Hudson; Gail Feinberg; Laura Hempstead; Christopher Zipp; John R Gimpel; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-10

7.  Multiple United States Medical Licensing Examination Attempts and the Estimated Risk of Disciplinary Actions Among Graduates of U.S. and Canadian Medical Schools.

Authors:  Katie L Arnhart; Monica M Cuddy; David Johnson; Michael A Barone; Aaron Young
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Do physician communication skills influence screening mammography utilization?

Authors:  Ari-Nareg Meguerditchian; Dale Dauphinee; Nadyne Girard; Tewodros Eguale; Kristen Riedel; André Jacques; Sarkis Meterissian; David L Buckeridge; Michal Abrahamowicz; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  The impact of large scale licensing examinations in highly developed countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julian Archer; Nick Lynn; Lee Coombes; Martin Roberts; Tom Gale; Tristan Price; Sam Regan de Bere
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of objective structured clinical examinations used in physical therapy licensure and a structured review of licensure practices in countries with well-developed regulation systems.

Authors:  Pavlos Bobos; Dimitra V Pouliopoulou; Alexandra Harriss; Jackie Sadi; Alison Rushton; Joy C MacDermid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.