Literature DB >> 10036597

How much do we count? Interpretation and error-making in the decennial census.

R R Iversen1, F F Furstenberg, A A Belzer.   

Abstract

Following a critique of the 1990 decennial census procedures, we conducted a field study among low-income, inner-city residents in 1991 to examine how they conceptualized and managed the civic task of census response. Interpretations about the purpose and meaning of the census, about commitment to the task, and about connection to government, singly and together with literacy skills (e.g., reading and general literacy competence), were associated with errors that are not detectable by evaluative methodologies used regularly by the Census Bureau. The validity and reliability of census data, and possibly other self-administered survey research, will be increased by greater use of knowledge about both interpretation and literacy skills in formulating data collection procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10036597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  2 in total

1.  Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis.

Authors:  J G Robinson; B Ahmed; P Das Gupta; K A Woodrow
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  How unclear terms affect survey data.

Authors:  F J Fowler
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  1992
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Missing minorities? The phases of IRCA legislation and relative net undercounts of the 1990 vis-à-vis 2000 decennial census for foreign-born cohorts.

Authors:  Matheu Kaneshiro
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.