Literature DB >> 10117390

Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. European Group for Health Management and Quality of Life Assessment.

S M Hunt1, J Alonso, D Bucquet, M Niero, I Wiklund, S McKenna.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest throughout Europe in measuring health needs in the general population and in the 'quality of life' of patients. This has led to a demand for questionnaires capable of measuring health status in a reliable and valid manner. Most existing measures have, however, been standardised only in the U.S.A. and, to a lesser extent, in the U.K. The issue of translation and retesting of questionnaires prepared in the English language for use in other countries has received surprisingly little attention. This paper describes some of the technical, linguistic and conceptual issues raised by translation and the processes involved in producing acceptable country-specific versions of the Nottingham Health Profile according to a systematic method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 10117390     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90072-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  60 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The EORTC breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23): translation and validation study of the Iranian version.

Authors:  A Montazeri; I Harirchi; M Vahdani; F Khaleghi; S Jarvandi; M Ebrahimi; M Haji-Mahmoodi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The equivalence of English and Chinese SF-36 versions in bilingual Singapore Chinese.

Authors:  Julian Thumboo; Kok-Yong Fong; Siew-Pang Chan; David Machin; Pao-Hsii Feng; Szu-Tien Thio; Mee-Leng Boey
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality-of-life assessment in cancer.

Authors:  F S van Dam; J Sternswärd
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; W L McBee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Operational aspects of Quality-of-Life Assessment. Choosing the right instrument.

Authors:  P Erickson; R C Taeuber; J Scott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) in French cancer patients.

Authors:  Nathalie Costet; Valérie Lapierre; Ellen Benhamou; Catherine Le Galès
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: does choice of preference weights make a difference?

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Richard J Willke; Mark J Atkinson; William R Lenderking; Constantine Frangakis; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The validation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QOL).

Authors:  Jan Vanderwegen; Gwen Van Nuffelen; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Adaptation of the osteoarthritis-specific quality of life scale (the OAQoL) for use in Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and Turkey.

Authors:  Jeanette Wilburn; Stephen P McKenna; Şehim Kutlay; Tamas Bender; Jürgen Braun; Concepcion Castillo-Gallego; Marta Favero; Pal Geher; Uta Kiltz; Emilio Martin-Mola; Roberta Ramonda; Matthew Rouse; Alan Tennant; Ayşe A Küçükdeveci
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.