Literature DB >> 10100064

Antihypertensive drug treatment: a comparison of usual care with self blood pressure measurement.

B Bailey1, S L Carney, A A Gillies, A J Smith.   

Abstract

Blood pressure self-measurement is increasing in most communities and yet its role in the management of hypertension is poorly understood. This study was devised to evaluate the behaviour of doctors in general practice when treating patients with poorly controlled essential hypertension who use self-measurement. Patients, most of whom were already taking antihypertensive medications were commenced on perindopril or indapamide at their doctor's discretion and were randomly allocated to self-measurement (SM) using an OMRON HEM706 oscillometric device or a continuation of their usual care (UC) over an 8-week period. This was an observational study without any specific or set treatment goals for the doctor to follow. Sixty of 62 subjects completed the study and the two groups were equally matched for age, body mass index, gender, and blood pressure (BP). While additional perindopril or indapamide produced a significant fall in BP in both groups over the study period, the systolic pressure remained significantly higher in the SM group (sitting 148 +/- 3 compared with 142 +/- 3; 145 +/- 3 compared with 138 +/- 3 mm Hg respectively; P < 0.05). Twenty-four hour and daytime ambulatory monitor systolic pressures were also significantly higher in the SM group. Differences in diastolic BP were not statistically significant. Furthermore, SM patients were less likely to have their medications increased and more likely to have them reduced or ceased. Doctors and patients found self-measurement convenient and useful. This study suggests that doctors prescribing decisions are influenced by evidence from self-measurement of BP with consequential increases in office BP related to reduced drug use. While self-BP measurement can offer reassurance about adequacy of control when away from a physicians office, our best evidence of understanding target blood pressures comes from large randomised studies using office blood pressures as an end-point. There is an urgent need for further study to provide arbitration between self-measurement and office blood pressures although each measurement must contribute to the management of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10100064     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  9 in total

1.  Distance technologies for patient monitoring. Interview by Abi Berger.

Authors:  E A Balas; I Iakovidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

2.  Changes in home versus clinic blood pressure with antihypertensive treatments: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joji Ishikawa; Deirdre J Carroll; Sujith Kuruvilla; Joseph E Schwartz; Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Knut Schroeder; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liam G Glynn; Andrew W Murphy; Susan M Smith; Knut Schroeder; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  What are the basic self-monitoring components for cardiovascular risk management?

Authors:  Alison M Ward; Carl Heneghan; Rafael Perera; Dan Lasserson; David Nunan; David Mant; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Francesco P Cappuccio; Sally M Kerry; Lindsay Forbes; Anna Donald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-11

7.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Tonya L Breaux-Shropshire; Eric Judd; Lee A Vucovich; Toneyell S Shropshire; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2015-07-03

Review 9.  A systematic review of the effects of home blood pressure monitoring on medication adherence.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe; Antoinette Schoenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.