BACKGROUND: Patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals: a condition labelled as 'uncontrolled' hypertension. The optimal way to organise and deliver care to hypertensive patients has not been clearly identified. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. DESIGN OF STUDY: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. SETTING: Primary and ambulatory care. METHOD: Interventions were categorised as following: self-monitoring; educational interventions directed to the patient; educational interventions directed to the health professional; health professional- (nurse or pharmacist) led care; organisational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care; and appointment reminder systems. Outcomes assessed were mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, control of blood pressure and proportion of patients followed up at clinic. RESULTS: Seventy-two RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The trials showed a wide variety of methodological quality. Self-monitoring was associated with net reductions in systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.5 mmHg, 95%CI = -3.7 to -1.3 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD -1.8 mmHg, 95%CI = -2.4 to -1.2 mmHg). An organised system of regular review allied to vigorous antihypertensive drug therapy was shown to reduce blood pressure and all-cause mortality in a single large randomised controlled trial. CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a vigorous stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels. Self-monitoring is a useful adjunct to care while reminder systems and nurse/pharmacist -led care require further evaluation.
BACKGROUND:Patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals: a condition labelled as 'uncontrolled' hypertension. The optimal way to organise and deliver care to hypertensivepatients has not been clearly identified. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. DESIGN OF STUDY: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. SETTING: Primary and ambulatory care. METHOD: Interventions were categorised as following: self-monitoring; educational interventions directed to the patient; educational interventions directed to the health professional; health professional- (nurse or pharmacist) led care; organisational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care; and appointment reminder systems. Outcomes assessed were mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, control of blood pressure and proportion of patients followed up at clinic. RESULTS: Seventy-two RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The trials showed a wide variety of methodological quality. Self-monitoring was associated with net reductions in systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.5 mmHg, 95%CI = -3.7 to -1.3 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD -1.8 mmHg, 95%CI = -2.4 to -1.2 mmHg). An organised system of regular review allied to vigorous antihypertensive drug therapy was shown to reduce blood pressure and all-cause mortality in a single large randomised controlled trial. CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a vigorous stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels. Self-monitoring is a useful adjunct to care while reminder systems and nurse/pharmacist -led care require further evaluation.
Authors: Gwenn E C Wetzels; Patricia J Nelemans; Jan S A G Schouten; Carmen D Dirksen; Trudy van der Weijden; Henri E J H Stoffers; Rob Janknegt; Peter W de Leeuw; Martin H Prins Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Wei Yang; Stephen E Kimmel; Raymond R Townsend; Alan G Wasserstein; Thomas R Ten Have; Warren B Bilker Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Brian McKinstry; Janet Hanley; David Heaney; Lucy McCloughan; Rob Elton; David J Webb Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: M A Rogers; D Small; D A Buchan; C A Butch; C M Stewart; B E Krenzer; H L Husovsky Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-06-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jerry Suls; Jazmin N Mogavero; Louise Falzon; Linda S Pescatello; Emily A Hennessy; Karina W Davidson Journal: Health Psychol Rev Date: 2019-11-29
Authors: Julie Langan Martin; Richard Lowrie; Alex McConnachie; Gary McLean; Frances Mair; Stewart W Mercer; Daniel J Smith Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jeff Whittle; Marilyn M Schapira; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Avery Hayes; Jeffrey Morzinski; Purushottam Laud; Dan Eastwood; Kristyn Ertl; Leslie Patterson; Katie E Mosack Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Katherine T Mills; Katherine M Obst; Wei Shen; Sandra Molina; Hui-Jie Zhang; Hua He; Lisa A Cooper; Jiang He Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michelle Nichols; Fred Stephen Sarfo; Arti Singh; Suparna Qanungo; Frank Treiber; Bruce Ovbiagele; Raelle Saulson; Sachin Patel; Carolyn Jenkins Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Wichai Aekplakorn; Paibul Suriyawongpaisal; Rassamee Tansirisithikul; Thida Sakulpipat; Phikul Charoensuk Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2015-11-16