Literature DB >> 18809791

Changes in home versus clinic blood pressure with antihypertensive treatments: a meta-analysis.

Joji Ishikawa1, Deirdre J Carroll, Sujith Kuruvilla, Joseph E Schwartz, Thomas G Pickering.   

Abstract

Home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring is recommended for assessing the effects of antihypertensive treatment, but it is not clear how the treatment-induced changes in HBP compare with the changes in clinic blood pressure (CBP). We searched PubMed using the terms "home or self-measured blood pressure," and selected articles in which the changes in CBP and HBP (using the upper arm oscillometric method) induced by antihypertensive drugs were presented. We performed a systematic review of 30 articles published before March 2008 that included a total of 6794 subjects. As there was significant heterogeneity in most of the outcomes, a random effects model was used for the meta-analyses. The mean changes (+/-SE) in CBP and HBP (systolic/diastolic) were -15.2+/-0.03/-10.3+/-0.03 mm Hg and -12.2+/-0.04/-8.0+/-0.04 mm Hg respectively, although there were wide varieties of differences in the reduction between HBP and CBP. The reductions in CBP were correlated with those of HBP (systolic BP; r=0.66, B=0.48, diastolic BP; r=0.71, B=0.52, P<0.001). In 7 studies that also included 24-hour BP monitoring, the reduction of HBP was greater than that of 24-hour BP in systolic (HBP; -12.6+/-0.06 mm Hg, 24-hour BP; -11.9+/-0.04 mm Hg, P<0.001). In 5 studies that included daytime and nighttime systolic BP separately, HBP decreased 15% more than daytime ambulatory BP and 30% more than nighttime ambulatory BP. In conclusion, HBP falls approximately 20% less than CBP with antihypertensive treatments. Daytime systolic BP falls 15% less and nighttime systolic BP falls 30% less than home systolic BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18809791      PMCID: PMC4593654          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.115600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  47 in total

1.  Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Staessen; J G Wang; L Thijs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Daichi Shimbo; Donald Haas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; L Thijs; R Fagard; E T O'Brien; D Clement; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; C Nachev; P Palatini; G Parati; J Tuomilehto; J Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Relation between initial blood pressure and its fall with treatment.

Authors:  J S Gill; A V Zezulka; D G Beevers; P Davies
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Superiority of home blood pressure measurements over office measurements for testing antihypertensive drugs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Decrease in urinary albumin excretion associated with the normalization of nocturnal blood pressure in hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Carlos Calvo; Diana E Ayala; José E López
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  The bedtime administration of doxazosin controls morning hypertension and albuminuria in patients with type-2 diabetes: evaluation using home-based blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Kyuzi Kamoi; Tomoo Ikarashi
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.749

8.  Effect of antihypertensive treatment on office and self-measured blood pressure: the Autodil study.

Authors:  M J Leeman; R L Lins; J E Sternon; B C Huberlant; C E Fassotte
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Changes in self-monitored pulse pressure correlate with improvements in B-type natriuretic Peptide and urinary albumin in treated hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Kazuo Eguchi; Yoshio Matsui; Seiichi Shibasaki; Joji Ishikawa; Satoshi Hoshide; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Tomoyuki Kabutoya; Joseph E Schwartz; Thomas G Pickering; Kazuyuki Shimada; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Self-measured systolic blood pressure in the morning is a strong indicator of decline of renal function in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic chronic renal insufficiency.

Authors:  H Suzuki; H Nakamoto; H Okada; S Sugahara; Y Kanno
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.749

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Carotid baroreceptor activation for the treatment of resistant hypertension and heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Doumas; Charles Faselis; Costas Tsioufis; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  The role of home BP monitoring: Answers to 10 common questions.

Authors:  Sonal J Patil; Richelle J Koopman; Jeffery Belden; Michael LeFevre
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 3.  Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Jacob George; Thomas MacDonald
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

4.  Home blood pressure measurements for managing hypertension in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Sangeetha Satyan; Pooneh Alborzi; Robert P Light; Getachew G Tegegne; Helmneh S Mazengia; Paulos M Yigazu
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.754

5.  Power to identify a genetic predictor of antihypertensive drug response using different methods to measure blood pressure response.

Authors:  Stephen T Turner; Gary L Schwartz; Arlene B Chapman; Amber L Beitelshees; John G Gums; Rhonda M Cooper-Dehoff; Eric Boerwinkle; Julie A Johnson; Kent R Bailey
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring in patients under antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  Jessica Barochiner; Lucas S Aparicio; Rocío Martínez; José Boggia
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Comparison of office, ambulatory, and home blood pressure antihypertensive response to atenolol and hydrochlorthiazide.

Authors:  Amber L Beitelshees; Yan Gong; Kent R Bailey; Stephen T Turner; Arlene B Chapman; Gary L Schwartz; John G Gums; Eric Boerwinkle; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Outcome-driven thresholds for home blood pressure measurement: international database of home blood pressure in relation to cardiovascular outcome.

Authors:  Teemu J Niiranen; Kei Asayama; Lutgarde Thijs; Jouni K Johansson; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; José Boggia; Atsushi Hozawa; Edgardo Sandoya; George S Stergiou; Ichiro Tsuji; Antti M Jula; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Management of hypertension and multiple risk factors to enhance cardiovascular health in Singapore: The SingHypertension cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Tazeen H Jafar; Ngiap Chuan Tan; John C Allen; Eric A Finkelstein; Paul Goh; Peter Moey; Joanne Hui Min Quah; Siew Wai Hwang; Juliana Bahadin; Anandan Gerard Thiagarajah; Jason Chan; Gary Kang; Agnes Koong
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Assessing the Utility of a Novel SMS- and Phone-Based System for Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients: Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Robert Mattson Peters; Nishkala Shivakumar; Ran Xu; Kavon Javaherian; Eric Sink; Kunjan Patel; Angela Brown; Justin Huynh; Melvin Blanchard; Will Ross; Jonathan Byrd
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2017-07-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.