Literature DB >> 9214962

Twenty-five years of obstetric patient satisfaction in North America: a review of the literature.

A Wilcock1, L Kobayashi, I Murray.   

Abstract

The North American literature on obstetric patient satisfaction of the past 25 years was reviewed using two major computerized databases. The articles identified by these searches were supplemented with other research articles identified in reference lists. The review highlights the difficulties inherent in the use of many different methodologies to study obstetric patient satisfaction. The main methodologies have been mailed questionnaires, telephone interviews, and semistructured interviews, with data collection periods ranging from 24 hours to 2 years postpartum. The various approaches to data collection make comparison of results among studies exceedingly difficult. The reluctance of patients to criticize their caregivers has been problematic and is evidenced by satisfaction ratings that are positively skewed. Factors that have been reported to be most influential in obstetric patient satisfaction include communication, control, participation in decision making, presence of a support person, information/prenatal classes, nursing care services, length of stay, and physical environment. The relative importance of these factors, however, has not been ascertained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9214962     DOI: 10.1097/00005237-199703000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0893-2190            Impact factor:   1.638


  7 in total

1.  Pregnancy planning guide. Evidence-based information for prospective parents.

Authors:  Krista M Maier; Colleen M Kirkham; Elizabeth Lim; Ka Wai Cheung; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Satisfaction with obstetric care. Patient survey in a family practice shared-call group.

Authors:  J L Shapiro
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A Framework for the Development of maternal quality of care indicators.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Michael C Lu; Carolina Reyes; Calvin J Hobel; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

4.  A statewide review of postnatal care in private hospitals in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Rayner; Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Louise Peters; Jane Yelland
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Participant experiences of mindfulness-based childbirth education: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Colleen Fisher; Yvonne Hauck; Sara Bayes; Jean Byrne
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Social psychological predictors of satisfaction with intrapartum and postpartum care - what matters to women in Czech maternity hospitals?

Authors:  Lea Takács; Jitka Mlíková Seidlerová; Lenka Šulová; Simona Horáková Hoskovcová
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2015-02-02

7.  Patient satisfaction with obstetricians and gynecologists compared with other specialties: analysis of US self-reported survey data.

Authors:  Isha Patel; Jongwha Chang; Jatin Srivastava; Steven Feldman; Michelle Levender; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-01-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.