Literature DB >> 10098558

Comparing telephone and mail responses to the CAHPS survey instrument. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

F J Fowler1, P M Gallagher, S Nederend.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans (CAHPS) survey is designed to collect member experiences with getting medical care. The objective was to evaluate the comparability of answers to CAHPS questions when data are collected by mail and by telephone interview.
METHODS: Two studies comparing phone and mail responses used a pretest instrument with parallel samples drawn from Medicaid beneficiaries in California (n = 217 telephone, 97 mail) and adults with chronic conditions who had health insurance through the State of Washington (n = 98 telephone, 109 mail). A third study used a revised instrument with two parallel cross-section samples of adults covered through the State of Washington (n = 446 telephone, 609 mail). Questions covered respondents' experiences with getting medical care through their health plans.
RESULTS: In the first two tests, numerous significant differences were found in the rates at which questions that potentially did not apply to all respondents were answered: some ratings were more positive on the telephone. In the test of a revised instrument, nine of 58 comparisons differed significantly by mode. The systematic differences in response to questions that did not apply to all respondents were greatly reduced. Only one of four ratings and one of seven multi-item composite measures of quality of care were significantly different by mode.
CONCLUSION: Although further steps to reduce the remaining mode effects are needed, the data indicate that when the revised CAHPS questions are used, mode of data collection will have little effect on the key results.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10098558     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  20 in total

1.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 1.0 Core Survey.

Authors:  G N Marshall; L S Morales; M Elliott; K Spritzer; R D Hays
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-06

2.  Toward a national consumer survey: evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP instruments.

Authors:  S V Eisen; J A Shaul; H S Leff; V Stringfellow; B R Clarridge; P D Cleary
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Effects of CAHPS health plan performance information on plan choices by New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  Donna O Farley; Pamela Farley Short; Marc N Elliott; David E Kanouse; Julie A Brown; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Consumer experiences in a consumer-driven health plan.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; Stephen T Parente; Roger Feldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Rationale and study protocol for a multi-component Health Information Technology (HIT) screening tool for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Kelly Biegler; Richard Mollica; Susan Elliott Sim; Elisa Nicholas; Maria Chandler; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Kittya Paigne; Sompia Paigne; Danh V Nguyen; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Han de Vries; Marc N Elliott; Kimberly A Hepner; San D Keller; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The effect of response scale, administration mode, and format on responses to the CAHPS Clinician and Group survey.

Authors:  Keith M Drake; J Lee Hargraves; Stephanie Lloyd; Patricia M Gallagher; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Demographic factors and hospital size predict patient satisfaction variance--implications for hospital value-based purchasing.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarland; Katherine A Ornstein; Randall F Holcombe
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  Health plan effects on patient assessments of Medicaid managed care among racial/ethnic minorities.

Authors:  Robert Weech-Maldonado; Marc N Elliott; Leo S Morales; Karen Spritzer; Grant N Marshall; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Can patients reliably identify safe, high quality care?

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Ryan K Schmocker; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Hosp Adm       Date:  2014-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.