Literature DB >> 25940305

Demographic factors and hospital size predict patient satisfaction variance--implications for hospital value-based purchasing.

Daniel C McFarland1, Katherine A Ornstein2, Randall F Holcombe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) incentivizes quality performance-based healthcare by linking payments directly to patient satisfaction scores obtained from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. Lower HCAHPS scores appear to cluster in heterogeneous population-dense areas and could bias Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement.
OBJECTIVE: Assess nonrandom variation in patient satisfaction as determined by HCAHPS.
DESIGN: Multivariate regression modeling was performed for individual dimensions of HCAHPS and aggregate scores. Standardized partial regression coefficients assessed strengths of predictors. Weighted Individual (hospital) Patient Satisfaction Adjusted Score (WIPSAS) utilized 4 highly predictive variables, and hospitals were reranked accordingly.
SETTING: A total of 3907 HVBP-participating hospitals. PATIENTS: There were 934,800 patient surveys by the most conservative estimate. MEASUREMENTS: A total of 3144 county demographics (US Census) and HCAHPS surveys.
RESULTS: Hospital size and primary language (non-English speaking) most strongly predicted unfavorable HCAHPS scores, whereas education and white ethnicity most strongly predicted favorable HCAHPS scores. The average adjusted patient satisfaction scores calculated by WIPSAS approximated the national average of HCAHPS scores. However, WIPSAS changed hospital rankings by variable amounts depending on the strength of the predictive variables in the hospitals' locations. Structural and demographic characteristics that predict lower scores were accounted for by WIPSAS that also improved rankings of many safety-net hospitals and academic medical centers in diverse areas.
CONCLUSIONS: Demographic and structural factors (eg, hospital beds) predict patient satisfaction scores even after CMS adjustments. CMS should consider WIPSAS or a similar adjustment to account for the severity of patient satisfaction inequities that hospitals could strive to correct.
© 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940305      PMCID: PMC4790720          DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  14 in total

1.  Hospital conversions, margins, and the provision of uncompensated care.

Authors:  K E Thorpe; C S Florence; E E Seiber
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Patient satisfaction measurement strategies: a comparison of phone and mail methods.

Authors:  T E Burroughs; B M Waterman; J C Cira; R Desikan; W Claiborne Dunagan
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2001-07

3.  Will value-based purchasing increase disparities in care?

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Characteristics of hospitals receiving penalties under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Alan M Zaslavsky; Marc N Elliott; Lawrence Zaborski; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The effect of financial incentives on hospitals that serve poor patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Elizabeth Goldstein; William Lehrman; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Megan K Beckett; Laura Giordano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons.

Authors:  Alan M Zaslavsky; Lawrence B Zaborski; Lin Ding; James A Shaul; Matthew J Cioffi; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001

10.  Association between value-based purchasing score and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  Bijan J Borah; Michael G Rock; Douglas L Wood; Daniel L Roellinger; Matthew G Johnson; James M Naessens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  17 in total

1.  The effect of information technology on hospital performance.

Authors:  Cynthia Williams; Yara Asi; Amanda Raffenaud; Matt Bagwell; Ibrahim Zeini
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  Demographics matter: the potentially disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on hospital ratings.

Authors:  Ariel R Belasen; Marlon R Tracey; Alan T Belasen
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Emergency department patient experience: Same location, same provider, different scores by different survey methods.

Authors:  Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont; Preet Kaur Sahota; Yanjun Chen; Maria Nguyen; Christine Louis; Jonathan Pena; Andrew Wong; Maxwell Jen
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2019

4.  Causal Effect Analysis of Demographic Concordance of Physician Trust and Respect in an Emergency Care Setting.

Authors:  Amy F Ho; Yuan Zhou; Jessica J Kirby; Md Mamunur Rahman; Kathryn Tessitore; Yousef Abdel-Raziq; James P d'Etienne; Chet D Schrader; Hao Wang
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-11-19

5.  Pediatric emergency medicine fellowship point-of-care ultrasound training in 2020.

Authors:  Natan Cramer; Lauren Cantwell; Hilary Ong; Shyam M Sivasankar; Danielle Graff; Simone L Lawson; Paria M Wilson; Kathleen A Noorbakhsh; Megan Mickley; Noel S Zuckerbraun; Brad Sobolewski; Jane K Soung; Devora B Azhdam; Desiree N Wagner Neville; Mark R Hincapie; Jennifer R Marin
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

6.  Bias in Patient Experience Scores in Radiation Oncology: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Elaine Cha; Noah J Mathis; Himanshu Joshi; Sonam Sharma; Melissa Zinovoy; Meng Ru; Oren Cahlon; Erin F Gillespie; Deborah C Marshall
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.240

7.  Who presents satisfied? Non-modifiable factors associated with patient satisfaction among gynecologic oncology clinic patients.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Jeannette T Bensen; Anna C Snavely; Paola A Gehrig; Kemi M Doll
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Prediction of hospital visits for the general inpatient care using floating catchment area methods: a reconceptualization of spatial accessibility.

Authors:  J Bauer; D Klingelhöfer; W Maier; L Schwettmann; D A Groneberg
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Factors Driving Patient Perception of Quality Care After Primary Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Devon C Freudenberger; Erin A Baker; Matthew P Siljander; Rachel S Rohde
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2018-11-08

10.  Evaluating the impact of social deprivation on Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey Scores.

Authors:  Andrew R Stephens; Jared W Potter; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.